tig — CS2 Stats

76561198184301471[U:1:224035743]

1,081Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,520Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3592 of 8472 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,240 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

20,520Peak Premier on CSDB

1,240Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,240
Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 111 to go
Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 20,520
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,480 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76

Positioning60

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6

Aggression5.6

Utility5.1

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6

Positioning6.0

Utility5.1

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time536ms−89ms

first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–10

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 42% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	19	8–11	42%	0.01
ancient	A	19	11–8	58%	0.03
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.00
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.02
nuke	S	13	9–4	69%	0.02
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
anubis	S	6	5–1	83%	0.01
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

269Matches

52%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

84.3ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	72	46%	1.08	16.5
Ancient	47	64%	1.21	18.0
Inferno	41	46%	1.15	17.3
Anubis	30	63%	1.12	16.5
Nuke	29	45%	1.19	18.1
Mirage	27	52%	1.06	15.1
Cache	15	40%	1.23	18.7
Train	4	100%	1.28	14.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.0%Spray accuracy

77.3%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

524msReaction time

34.4%T opening success

46.1%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

10.8%Flash assists

7.07HE damage / grenade

6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.7528% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.3766% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	4–13	-0.02	14%	27 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	15%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.02	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	11%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	10%	26 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.01	11%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	6%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–9	-0.07	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	29%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.00	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.00	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	14%	22 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	13%	21 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.01	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	9%	20 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	22%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.03	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.05	18%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.13	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	19–22	-0.00	14%	17 Aug →
cache	20–22	0.04	18%	17 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	16%	14 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	10%	14 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	11%	13 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	18%	13 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	8%	13 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	13%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.02	9%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.08	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.03	11%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	11%	12 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.10	13%	11 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	8%	10 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.07	14%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.11	12%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	15%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.07	10%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.01	18%	8 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	10%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	5%	7 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	6%	7 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.06	5%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–0	-0.03	33%	7 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.04	21%	7 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	9%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	14%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	16%	7 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.04	20%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.11	16%	6 Aug →
vertigo	2–13	-0.07	3%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.10	16%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.15	9%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	21%	6 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.09	19%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	15%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	9%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.09	0%	25 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	4%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	15%	24 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	15%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	21%	24 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.03	13%	24 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.04	17%	24 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	21%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	11%	23 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	16%	22 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.02	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	11%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	20%	20 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	14%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.00	27%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	23%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	16%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	12%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	13%	18 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.08	13%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	12%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	14%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	8%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	7%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.06	14%	17 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	11%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.03	9%	17 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.01	15%	17 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.02	7%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	11%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	14%	17 Jul →