riskyb0b — CS2 Stats

76561198175497213[U:1:215231485]✓ No bans

833Tracked matches60%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating6,161Light Blue band · top ~73.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18915 of 24783 tracked
FaceitLevel 2 · 540 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGriskyb0bFACEITLevel 2 · 540 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER6,161 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning61
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateLWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression7.4
Utility4.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time646ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 707ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms
Headshot accuracy11.4%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.3% → last ⅓ avg 11.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–2
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15cacheWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.02
ancientA23131057%0.02
mirageA1810856%0.00
cacheD1551033%0.02
anubisS1510567%0.00
inferno31233%0.06
nuke220100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches
48%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
72.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1354%0.8812.3
Anubis956%0.7912.0
Dust2838%0.8414.0
Ancient757%1.0214.3
Nuke333%0.618.7
Cache20%0.568.0
Overpass10%0.8916.0
Inferno1100%1.1120.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.8%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
644msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
14.77HE damage / grenade
4.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.7554% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8079% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0214%19 Aug
cache13–10.0212%19 Aug
anubis3–13-0.109%19 Aug
mirage12–16-0.026%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0112%16 Aug
ancient11–130.037%16 Aug
dust213–80.0229%16 Aug
anubis13–40.0410%16 Aug
dust213–40.0717%16 Aug
anubis13–70.0313%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0512%15 Aug
ancient0–2-0.030%15 Aug
ancient13–110.047%15 Aug
dust213–70.0218%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0213%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0510%15 Aug
nuke13–00.097%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0113%15 Aug
ancient13–20.0512%15 Aug
inferno11–130.0910%13 Aug
ancient13–50.0211%13 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0115%13 Aug
cache13–20.0611%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.069%12 Aug
mirage12–160.019%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0111%8 Aug
mirage13–90.075%8 Aug
dust213–7-0.0218%8 Aug
ancient7–130.0512%8 Aug
anubis13–80.1115%8 Aug
anubis13–7-0.028%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.039%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0716%8 Aug
dust213–40.0725%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.0111%8 Aug
dust29–130.0111%7 Aug
cache13–160.028%7 Aug
dust210–50.0210%7 Aug
inferno9–130.0312%6 Aug
ancient13–20.1613%6 Aug
dust211–13-0.018%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0223%5 Aug
cache16–130.039%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0415%5 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0117%4 Aug
ancient13–60.1010%4 Aug
cache9–130.016%2 Aug
mirage13–60.0011%2 Aug
ancient9–13-0.025%2 Aug
anubis13–50.0122%2 Aug
mirage6–130.048%2 Aug
anubis13–100.0314%2 Aug
ancient13–5-0.034%2 Aug
dust213–60.0810%1 Aug
cache13–100.0415%1 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0312%1 Aug
ancient13–40.0617%1 Aug
dust20–13-0.0415%1 Aug
anubis13–10.1315%1 Aug
dust213–60.0210%1 Aug
dust213–9-0.0220%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0111%1 Aug
mirage13–9-0.018%1 Aug
dust213–40.0914%1 Aug
cache12–160.1312%1 Aug
mirage13–6-0.019%1 Aug
dust29–10.1522%1 Aug
mirage5–130.069%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0117%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.056%1 Aug
ancient13–80.1011%31 Jul
dust214–160.0510%31 Jul
ancient9–130.079%31 Jul
cache11–130.008%31 Jul
dust29–130.0312%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0611%29 Jul
mirage13–5-0.022%29 Jul
anubis13–8-0.029%25 Jul
anubis0–13-0.0530%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0210%25 Jul
ancient13–90.047%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0310%25 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0314%25 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1113%24 Jul
nuke13–40.026%24 Jul
cache13–160.049%23 Jul
dust216–130.0113%23 Jul
anubis13–3-0.027%23 Jul
ancient0–8-0.030%23 Jul
dust213–30.0512%23 Jul
cache7–130.0315%23 Jul
dust211–130.0416%22 Jul
cache1–10-0.0519%22 Jul
ancient8–30.0210%22 Jul
cache13–5-0.007%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0616%18 Jul
dust213–16-0.0413%18 Jul
anubis13–100.0512%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.048%18 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0421%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →