super gremlin

super gremlin — CS2 Stats

GB76561198170283641[U:1:210017913]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

653Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,398 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsuper gremlinFACEITLevel 7 · 1,398 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning58
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateWWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression7.8
Utility4.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.8
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time630ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–9
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9cacheWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28161257%0.01
dust2B147750%-0.03
nukeB126650%0.03
cacheD1221017%0.01
infernoS96367%0.03
ancientA85363%0.03
anubisA85363%0.02
overpass31233%0.03
office21150%0.06
fachwerk110100%-0.02
shelter110100%0.10
italy1010%-0.08
alpine1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

233Matches
54%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
87.7ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage771%0.9616.9
Nuke757%1.1317.0
Dust2757%1.0115.4
Ancient667%1.1317.0
Inferno30%0.6611.3
Overpass367%0.9414.7
Train1100%2.0923.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
638msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
6.88HE damage / grenade
5.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4233% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0516%17 Aug
nuke13–100.0724%9 Aug
cache3–13-0.0235%9 Aug
nuke13–160.0615%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.0111%25 Jul
ancient13–90.1717%25 Jul
nuke8–130.0819%25 Jul
anubis13–70.0516%24 Jul
mirage9–130.1126%16 Jul
fachwerk13–9-0.0214%15 Jul
shelter13–30.1018%15 Jul
cache13–16-0.0426%14 Jul
cache5–130.1131%9 Jul
italy4–13-0.0814%8 Jul
office12–120.0411%8 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0310%7 Jul
alpine8–130.0526%7 Jul
office13–80.0716%7 Jul
cache4–9-0.0217%6 Jul
cache8–130.0619%6 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0218%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0325%1 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0426%1 Jul
overpass13–50.0830%30 Jun
inferno16–140.0416%30 Jun
cache11–130.028%29 Jun
cache12–120.0620%29 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0226%29 Jun
nuke0–20.000%29 Jun
nuke13–80.0729%28 Jun
cache4–130.0132%28 Jun
mirage13–80.1521%28 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0719%23 Jun
nuke13–100.0412%21 Jun
anubis13–40.0317%21 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0020%21 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0120%20 Jun
dust213–8-0.0216%13 Jun
dust21–13-0.100%13 Jun
overpass6–130.0513%13 Jun
mirage16–120.019%13 Jun
mirage13–60.0516%12 Jun
dust25–13-0.1314%11 Jun
nuke13–110.0419%11 Jun
cache13–100.0120%11 Jun
mirage6–130.0213%11 Jun
mirage13–70.0413%11 Jun
nuke13–60.0424%11 Jun
dust213–90.0213%11 Jun
nuke8–130.0219%7 Jun
dust213–50.044%7 Jun
ancient13–100.0318%7 Jun
nuke13–60.0115%6 Jun
dust25–13-0.049%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0213%6 Jun
inferno13–10.0512%6 Jun
inferno13–50.1121%6 Jun
cache13–60.0316%6 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0127%6 Jun
dust213–11-0.0421%6 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0115%5 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0518%5 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0119%5 Jun
anubis13–10.0212%5 Jun
anubis13–40.0516%4 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0430%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.047%4 Jun
dust213–10.0624%4 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0720%4 Jun
mirage11–130.0010%3 Jun
mirage4–00.0450%3 Jun
dust23–13-0.0819%3 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0220%3 Jun
dust28–6-0.0438%3 Jun
ancient13–20.0412%31 May
cache9–13-0.0626%31 May
ancient13–6-0.0429%30 May
inferno4–13-0.0514%30 May
ancient15–150.1010%30 May
mirage14–160.048%30 May
dust215–150.0420%30 May
mirage13–90.0515%29 May
mirage13–10-0.0335%29 May
mirage13–40.0510%29 May
overpass14–16-0.0523%29 May
inferno5–13-0.0813%29 May
dust213–110.0014%28 May
mirage13–90.0122%28 May
inferno13–30.1722%28 May
dust25–13-0.0727%28 May
mirage7–130.0322%27 May
mirage9–13-0.0522%27 May
ancient13–40.0011%27 May
inferno13–100.0133%27 May
mirage13–100.0011%26 May
inferno13–10-0.0113%26 May
mirage11–130.0713%26 May
dust211–13-0.0513%26 May
anubis12–16-0.0218%22 May
anubis9–130.0216%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →