RegentSchema — CS2 Stats

76561198170096571[U:1:209830843]✓ No bans

2,035Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,407Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning43

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1

Aggression5.3

Utility6.5

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning4.3

Utility6.5

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time554ms−53ms

first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms

Headshot accuracy20.3%+3.9%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 9–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	19	11–8	58%	0.01
cache	B	16	8–8	50%	0.00
dust2	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.00
inferno	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.01
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.02
vertigo	—	4	3–1	75%	0.00
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches

68%Win rate

1.38Avg K/D

92.4ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	31	77%	1.54	18.6
Dust2	18	67%	1.16	17.3
Inferno	14	79%	1.41	16.6
Anubis	11	73%	1.36	18.1
Ancient	6	50%	1.10	15.7
Nuke	6	50%	1.57	25.7
Overpass	3	100%	1.48	17.0
Cache	2	100%	1.10	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

563msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

46.5%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

13.5%Flash assists

9.87HE damage / grenade

11.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.946% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	8–13	-0.06	19%	29 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	19%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.04	17%	25 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.21	27%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.09	31%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	14%	25 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.05	36%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	15%	25 Aug →
nuke	0–4	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	40%	24 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	14%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	56%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	12%	23 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.06	11%	23 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.04	35%	20 Aug →
cache	13–2	-0.03	20%	20 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	21%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	18%	20 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.10	27%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	19%	20 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.08	20%	19 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	14%	18 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	19%	18 Aug →
mirage	1–13	0.10	28%	18 Aug →
italy	13–8	-0.04	13%	17 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	21%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	3%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.05	11%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	10%	14 Aug →
boulder	3–13	-0.04	18%	14 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	20%	13 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	26%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.07	12%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	21%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.00	10%	13 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	10%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	10%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	31%	13 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	14%	13 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.07	20%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	19%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	21%	12 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	17%	11 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.03	13%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	18%	10 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.00	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	14%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.08	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	12%	10 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.09	12%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.03	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	12%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.00	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	24%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	9%	7 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.07	18%	7 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	22%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.04	31%	7 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	19%	7 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.00	50%	6 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	8%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	7%	4 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.01	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	12%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	11%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.05	25%	4 Aug →
eldorado	2–9	-0.07	23%	4 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	19%	4 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.10	12%	3 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.08	11%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.03	14%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.08	27%	1 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.03	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.08	22%	31 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.04	12%	31 Jul →
anubis	16–13	-0.04	12%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	22%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.05	36%	28 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.01	19%	28 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.04	16%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	9%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	24%	28 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.09	13%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	17%	28 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.12	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.09	14%	28 Jul →