Tacosrule123

Tacosrule123 — CS2 Stats

76561198161288782[U:1:201023054]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

711Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,386 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTacosrule123FACEITLevel 7 · 1,386 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning61
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression8.4
Utility7.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.1
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time669ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — anubis 13–3
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7cacheWeakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2591636%0.03
mirageB23121152%0.02
dust2C156940%0.01
anubisA127558%0.03
infernoB115645%0.03
nukeS76186%0.06
ancient3030%-0.01
overpass21150%0.02
vertigo1010%0.02
office110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

488Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
74.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4349%1.1015.4
Inferno2938%0.9414.4
Dust22650%0.9414.6
Anubis1839%0.9413.7
Nuke1354%1.1416.2
Ancient1267%1.0315.9
Cache1173%1.5013.3
Vertigo862%0.8413.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
637msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
14.5%Flash assists
9.29HE damage / grenade
10.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.9074% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.1131%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0231%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.0514%10 Aug
mirage8–130.0017%9 Aug
cache11–130.0517%6 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0210%5 Aug
mirage8–130.0315%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0336%3 Aug
anubis6–10.0438%3 Aug
inferno13–110.1022%31 Jul
cache12–120.1122%30 Jul
mirage13–50.2127%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0530%29 Jul
cache13–60.0414%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0425%28 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0619%27 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0424%25 Jul
cache0–4-0.0725%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0421%24 Jul
nuke16–140.0325%23 Jul
cache12–12-0.0012%22 Jul
cache7–90.1315%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0025%19 Jul
cache7–13-0.0521%16 Jul
inferno13–80.1322%15 Jul
cache8–20.1218%14 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0323%14 Jul
dust213–100.1021%13 Jul
nuke9–130.0425%9 Jul
cache8–13-0.0313%9 Jul
cache9–130.0520%9 Jul
cache10–130.0027%9 Jul
dust23–13-0.0723%9 Jul
cache13–70.0629%7 Jul
mirage2–13-0.077%6 Jul
nuke13–40.0720%2 Jul
mirage13–80.0424%1 Jul
nuke13–80.0512%1 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0342%1 Jul
anubis3–1-0.0133%1 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0240%29 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0416%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0616%29 Jun
anubis12–120.0613%26 Jun
dust20–4-0.0567%26 Jun
ancient12–120.0120%24 Jun
inferno13–90.0415%12 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0424%12 Jun
cache13–30.0218%12 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0219%9 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0214%3 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0224%3 Jun
inferno5–130.0423%3 Jun
cache13–60.0515%2 Jun
cache13–40.0818%2 Jun
mirage13–40.1714%2 Jun
dust28–13-0.0120%2 Jun
ancient14–160.0122%27 May
overpass7–13-0.039%27 May
nuke13–70.0328%27 May
dust213–40.0518%27 May
dust213–90.0518%25 May
nuke13–50.1325%25 May
inferno15–15-0.0120%25 May
cache11–13-0.140%9 May
cache3–13-0.0618%6 May
cache9–13-0.0122%6 May
cache8–130.0428%5 May
vertigo1–130.0239%5 May
anubis13–30.2625%5 May
cache13–40.2420%5 May
cache10–13-0.0219%3 May
cache13–00.0325%1 May
cache7–130.0723%29 Apr
cache4–130.0318%29 Apr
cache10–5-0.090%29 Apr
inferno11–130.0220%27 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0124%21 Apr
anubis13–50.0612%21 Apr
anubis3–13-0.034%29 Mar
mirage3–13-0.056%25 Mar
overpass13–30.0733%24 Mar
inferno7–13-0.120%24 Mar
dust213–90.0227%24 Mar
dust213–100.0629%22 Mar
dust211–130.0724%19 Mar
office13–50.0234%19 Mar
dust23–13-0.0719%18 Mar
inferno13–40.0418%17 Mar
dust210–13-0.0016%17 Mar
anubis2–13-0.027%17 Mar
anubis13–40.1217%16 Mar
mirage13–80.0336%16 Mar
dust213–70.0125%16 Mar
nuke13–40.0916%16 Mar
mirage11–130.0021%16 Mar
mirage8–130.0014%15 Mar
inferno13–80.1126%15 Mar
mirage13–40.0319%15 Mar
mirage13–100.1122%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →