lukester — CS2 Stats

76561198149681277[U:1:189415549]

3,678Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,649Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4152 of 18397 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,200 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlukesterFACEITLevel 8 · 1,200 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,649 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning56
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50446Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression6.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch1.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time624ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+9.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — ancient
9Longest win streak
L5Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 24cacheWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2416867%0.02
infernoB179853%0.03
nukeC125742%0.03
cacheD123925%0.03
dust2D113827%-0.02
ancientS96367%0.01
anubisA74357%0.03
overpass330100%0.02
office21150%-0.02
train1010%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.01
boulder1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

192Matches
55%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
86.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6945%1.1316.0
Ancient2763%1.2617.6
Inferno2572%1.3417.7
Nuke1861%1.2217.8
Dust21553%0.9015.3
Anubis1258%1.1517.1
Overpass771%1.2815.4
Cache617%0.8515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
621msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
8.56HE damage / grenade
7.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5373% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–110.0139%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0232%25 Aug
train0–11-0.0312%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0919%18 Aug
office10–13-0.0435%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0528%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0118%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0533%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0022%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0617%5 Aug
inferno13–100.0727%5 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0555%4 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0529%4 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0027%3 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0131%2 Aug
office13–3-0.0015%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0922%30 Jul
cache10–130.0030%30 Jul
inferno0–13-0.017%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0126%29 Jul
cache7–13-0.0443%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0010%28 Jul
cache13–50.1411%28 Jul
nuke13–70.0327%28 Jul
nuke13–100.0016%27 Jul
anubis13–100.0125%27 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0110%26 Jul
inferno13–70.1341%26 Jul
cache13–90.0411%26 Jul
mirage13–110.1124%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0515%25 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0121%25 Jul
cache15–150.0524%21 Jul
inferno7–130.0224%21 Jul
ancient13–20.1020%21 Jul
cache1–130.0724%21 Jul
nuke9–60.0320%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0223%19 Jul
inferno13–70.0824%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0225%17 Jul
boulder11–130.0420%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0614%15 Jul
ancient13–70.036%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0120%15 Jul
nuke9–130.0614%15 Jul
cache8–130.1024%15 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0622%15 Jul
dust213–80.0019%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0231%14 Jul
nuke14–160.0422%14 Jul
overpass13–100.0412%14 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0012%14 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0321%14 Jul
ancient9–130.0118%13 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0119%13 Jul
cache8–130.0513%13 Jul
nuke14–160.0717%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0012%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0915%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0524%11 Jul
inferno13–80.0512%11 Jul
mirage16–140.0411%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0722%10 Jul
anubis11–130.0113%10 Jul
nuke5–130.129%9 Jul
cache15–15-0.0011%9 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0028%7 Jul
mirage13–100.0313%7 Jul
overpass13–40.0318%6 Jul
mirage13–110.0012%6 Jul
dust213–11-0.0217%6 Jul
inferno10–130.0520%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0120%30 Jun
ancient13–30.0616%30 Jun
mirage10–130.0010%30 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0210%30 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0516%30 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0224%30 Jun
dust28–13-0.019%30 Jun
dust213–50.0123%29 Jun
dust211–13-0.036%29 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0114%29 Jun
mirage13–30.1510%29 Jun
inferno13–50.0114%29 Jun
mirage13–50.036%28 Jun
mirage13–90.1316%28 Jun
anubis13–100.1211%28 Jun
nuke10–130.099%28 Jun
inferno13–60.0612%28 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0219%27 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0022%27 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0013%27 Jun
mirage8–130.0318%27 Jun
anubis13–100.0923%26 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0422%26 Jun
dust28–13-0.0623%26 Jun
mirage11–130.0420%26 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0717%26 Jun
mirage5–13-0.018%26 Jun
inferno13–60.0114%26 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →