ADuckOnDaQuack

ADuckOnDaQuack — CS2 Stats

US76561198145176093[U:1:184910365]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

381Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,216Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26548 of 56071 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGADuckOnDaQuackFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,216 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression8.0
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time580ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–3
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB21111052%0.03
mirageA2012860%0.02
dust2C2081240%0.03
infernoS1310377%0.05
cacheD124833%0.02
ancientS54180%0.02
overpass42250%0.03
anubis3030%-0.01
eldorado1010%0.01
poseidon110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
51%Win rate
1.46Avg K/D
93.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2560%1.6620.6
Mirage540%1.3017.6
Cache2100%2.3817.0
Ancient1100%1.1622.0
Anubis10%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.1%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
582msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
10.49HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8982% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–140.0617%25 Aug
inferno13–50.0713%25 Aug
inferno9–70.1029%25 Aug
ancient13–90.0514%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0120%24 Aug
nuke11–130.0220%24 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0113%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.0017%22 Aug
dust213–40.1921%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0613%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0917%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0326%18 Aug
cache3–13-0.0113%18 Aug
dust213–50.1413%18 Aug
dust215–150.0220%16 Aug
nuke13–50.0312%16 Aug
mirage12–160.0721%16 Aug
nuke13–100.1316%11 Aug
cache11–130.0320%11 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0615%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.0019%6 Aug
anubis15–150.0620%6 Aug
nuke13–80.0111%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0318%6 Aug
ancient13–80.0113%5 Aug
mirage10–130.0110%5 Aug
dust213–110.0215%5 Aug
cache13–6-0.0111%5 Aug
inferno11–130.1113%4 Aug
ancient13–10.0712%4 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0325%3 Aug
inferno13–90.0414%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0114%3 Aug
dust212–160.0614%3 Aug
inferno9–30.2914%3 Aug
cache13–90.0319%1 Aug
inferno13–110.0416%1 Aug
dust210–130.0414%1 Aug
cache13–50.0412%1 Aug
nuke13–60.049%1 Aug
dust29–130.0515%28 Jul
cache9–13-0.0011%28 Jul
ancient13–10.0422%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0610%28 Jul
cache11–130.0417%27 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0018%27 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0522%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0212%27 Jul
nuke16–140.0022%18 Jul
cache10–130.0110%18 Jul
mirage13–100.0311%18 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0418%16 Jul
cache13–40.1523%16 Jul
dust213–50.0417%14 Jul
nuke6–90.0015%11 Jul
eldorado6–90.0122%11 Jul
mirage16–120.0015%9 Jul
mirage11–130.1010%9 Jul
nuke13–90.0819%9 Jul
cache13–160.0212%9 Jul
inferno0–9-0.2113%7 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0710%7 Jul
mirage13–70.1111%6 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0610%6 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0313%6 Jul
mirage13–80.1113%6 Jul
nuke10–130.019%6 Jul
nuke11–130.0219%6 Jul
dust25–13-0.0020%5 Jul
dust25–13-0.0622%4 Jul
overpass15–150.0214%4 Jul
mirage9–130.0111%4 Jul
nuke13–110.0219%2 Jul
nuke16–140.0712%2 Jul
dust213–11-0.0113%30 Jun
mirage13–100.0612%30 Jun
inferno9–70.0220%30 Jun
dust23–130.0124%30 Jun
mirage13–80.0410%30 Jun
mirage13–50.0315%30 Jun
inferno4–9-0.044%30 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0112%29 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0016%29 Jun
inferno13–40.0945%29 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0512%29 Jun
overpass13–80.0411%29 Jun
dust25–13-0.0112%27 Jun
overpass13–160.0912%27 Jun
mirage13–70.024%27 Jun
dust29–130.0013%27 Jun
nuke9–130.016%27 Jun
dust213–100.0514%25 Jun
nuke9–130.039%25 Jun
nuke9–130.0716%25 Jun
dust213–70.0118%25 Jun
dust23–13-0.0717%25 Jun
dust213–60.056%23 Jun
inferno13–70.0525%23 Jun
poseidon9–30.0910%23 Jun
nuke10–130.0210%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →