rckzin1 — CS2 Stats

76561198134321850[U:1:174056122]

524Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,537 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrckzin1FACEITLevel 8 · 1,537 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning41
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression3.0
Utility6.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time634ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–3
132Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
L6Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B34161847%-0.02
anubisC1761135%-0.02
mirageS1612475%-0.02
ancientD124833%-0.03
nukeD93633%-0.02
overpassS65183%-0.01
infernoA53260%-0.04
cache110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

499Matches
54%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
63.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27250%0.8012.2
Mirage6755%0.8812.7
Ancient3549%0.8411.7
Overpass2846%0.9013.6
Nuke2650%0.7812.8
Inferno2450%0.7712.4
Train1958%0.9015.7
Anubis367%0.9317.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
655msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
7.70HE damage / grenade
16.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5084% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–130.0316%18 May
inferno3–13-0.0424%18 May
dust25–130.0221%14 May
anubis3–13-0.0112%13 May
mirage4–13-0.0413%11 May
dust210–13-0.0617%29 Apr
cache19–16-0.0419%29 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0513%28 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0116%26 Mar
dust216–14-0.0818%26 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0416%25 Mar
dust213–5-0.0526%25 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0353%25 Mar
dust26–4-0.0512%25 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0522%25 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0532%25 Mar
ancient0–13-0.0715%16 Mar
mirage16–12-0.0430%15 Mar
dust28–130.0114%15 Mar
dust213–7-0.087%15 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0511%15 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0725%12 Mar
dust213–8-0.0014%7 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0310%6 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0121%6 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0111%6 Mar
anubis4–130.025%6 Mar
mirage13–2-0.0021%6 Mar
dust26–13-0.067%5 Mar
dust21–9-0.0717%2 Mar
dust211–13-0.0633%2 Mar
dust25–13-0.1118%2 Mar
dust27–13-0.0214%26 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0822%26 Feb
dust27–130.0122%25 Feb
ancient3–6-0.074%25 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0319%25 Feb
overpass13–80.0318%24 Feb
anubis13–90.0025%24 Feb
anubis13–60.0122%23 Feb
dust29–10.0275%23 Feb
inferno13–10-0.056%23 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0411%23 Feb
dust213–11-0.019%23 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0015%22 Feb
ancient13–100.0220%21 Feb
dust213–60.0220%21 Feb
anubis10–130.0115%20 Feb
dust213–80.0118%20 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0626%20 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0322%19 Feb
dust27–13-0.0224%19 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0123%19 Feb
mirage10–130.0322%19 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0610%19 Feb
nuke11–130.0329%18 Feb
anubis13–70.0225%18 Feb
mirage13–110.0018%18 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0317%17 Feb
dust211–130.0012%17 Feb
dust213–30.1210%17 Feb
ancient9–13-0.075%16 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0017%16 Feb
anubis13–70.0338%16 Feb
dust26–13-0.0413%16 Feb
dust216–120.0520%15 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0311%15 Feb
dust210–13-0.0313%15 Feb
mirage13–30.016%15 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0617%15 Feb
dust210–13-0.0232%14 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0517%14 Feb
mirage13–60.0215%14 Feb
dust213–30.0118%14 Feb
nuke3–130.0115%14 Feb
overpass16–14-0.0311%14 Feb
dust211–130.0318%14 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0216%13 Feb
dust213–6-0.0725%13 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0515%11 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0418%10 Feb
anubis7–13-0.047%10 Feb
dust213–160.0424%9 Feb
nuke11–130.0018%8 Feb
anubis12–16-0.0313%8 Feb
ancient13–50.0428%8 Feb
mirage13–90.1018%7 Feb
inferno11–13-0.068%7 Feb
mirage13–8-0.028%7 Feb
dust213–8-0.0119%7 Feb
nuke13–100.014%7 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0213%7 Feb
dust213–9-0.0420%7 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0419%5 Feb
dust213–16-0.0515%5 Feb
dust213–7-0.0110%4 Feb
dust210–13-0.0116%4 Feb
nuke11–13-0.084%1 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0713%1 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0110%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →