Rutex

Rutex — CS2 Stats

76561198128964023[U:1:168698295]Steam profile ↗

2,494Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,666 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRutexFACEITLevel 10 · 2,666 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning52
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.2
Utility4.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time649ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–1
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34171750%0.01
dust2B21111052%0.01
cacheB178947%-0.01
anubisA117464%0.03
ancientD82625%0.00
nukeC52340%-0.01
inferno43175%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,847Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
77.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70050%1.0515.4
Dust248552%1.0915.7
Ancient45450%1.0515.6
Anubis25051%1.1115.7
Inferno21153%1.0815.4
Nuke13141%0.9814.4
Train5446%0.9715.1
Overpass3043%1.0915.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
643msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
5.28HE damage / grenade
5.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0115% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0519%7 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0231%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0520%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0121%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0622%31 Jul
dust213–70.0332%31 Jul
mirage13–40.0322%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0125%30 Jul
dust215–150.0417%30 Jul
cache13–6-0.0116%30 Jul
cache13–0-0.0122%2 Jun
cache12–120.0216%2 Jun
cache6–13-0.0229%27 May
mirage4–13-0.0722%27 May
cache3–13-0.0224%23 May
mirage11–130.0225%21 May
cache13–2-0.0233%21 May
cache0–13-0.0814%21 May
cache6–13-0.0315%20 May
cache13–70.0427%18 May
cache12–12-0.0123%17 May
nuke8–13-0.018%13 May
dust213–40.1039%13 May
anubis13–90.0324%13 May
cache13–8-0.0327%13 May
cache5–13-0.0216%11 May
cache5–13-0.1210%10 May
cache13–20.0920%10 May
cache11–110.1129%10 May
cache13–50.0226%10 May
cache13–9-0.0426%9 May
anubis11–13-0.0211%30 Apr
nuke7–130.0118%29 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0218%29 Apr
anubis10–130.0529%28 Apr
mirage10–130.0117%27 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0513%27 Apr
dust210–13-0.0219%27 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0215%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0116%24 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0015%22 Apr
mirage13–100.0818%19 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0120%12 Apr
mirage11–130.0213%11 Apr
ancient13–70.0518%11 Apr
mirage13–90.0523%5 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0823%4 Mar
dust213–100.0126%3 Mar
inferno13–10.1329%27 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0220%27 Feb
dust213–10-0.0223%18 Feb
dust25–13-0.0126%18 Feb
inferno13–30.0523%2 Feb
ancient14–160.0427%17 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0415%17 Jan
mirage13–100.0623%17 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0247%17 Jan
anubis13–90.0829%17 Jan
mirage13–40.1333%17 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0220%16 Jan
anubis16–120.1124%16 Jan
dust215–190.0425%16 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0219%11 Jan
mirage8–130.0417%10 Jan
anubis13–60.0423%9 Jan
mirage5–130.0016%8 Jan
mirage16–140.0924%8 Jan
mirage19–170.029%8 Jan
mirage13–20.018%8 Jan
mirage10–130.0421%8 Jan
mirage13–40.1119%8 Jan
anubis13–110.0924%8 Jan
nuke13–80.0212%7 Jan
dust211–13-0.0322%7 Jan
dust216–130.018%6 Jan
mirage13–90.0325%2 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0317%1 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0120%30 Dec
ancient17–190.0321%29 Dec
dust28–130.0226%28 Dec
dust214–16-0.0110%26 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0412%26 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0724%25 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0920%4 Dec
dust213–50.0130%30 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0723%30 Nov
ancient16–120.0628%27 Nov
ancient9–130.0213%27 Nov
anubis11–130.0719%24 Nov
mirage13–110.0334%22 Nov
dust213–80.0630%22 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0610%16 Nov
dust213–8-0.0028%14 Nov
mirage10–130.0330%12 Nov
dust213–2-0.0045%11 Nov
dust213–60.0317%11 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0520%11 Nov
dust213–10-0.0130%10 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0316%8 Nov
mirage11–130.0417%6 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →