more.beer — CS2 Stats

76561198103382326[U:1:143116598]✓ No bans

2,153Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,142Purple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning62

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–53–5Last 10042%Win rateWLLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3

Aggression8.6

Utility3.1

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning6.2

Utility3.1

Mechanics9.1

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time596ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms

Headshot accuracy15.9%−3.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 5–2

13–2Biggest win — shelter

4Longest win streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 86% over 7cacheWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	16	5–11	31%	0.01
cache	D	11	2–9	18%	0.03
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	0.04
mirage	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
inferno	A	9	5–4	56%	0.02
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
overpass	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
office	S	7	6–1	86%	0.01
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	0.05
vertigo	D	6	2–4	33%	0.02
train	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.00
shelter	—	3	1–2	33%	0.07
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

208Matches

53%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

77.1ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	30	53%	1.06	13.7
Ancient	27	52%	0.92	13.9
Dust2	23	48%	0.99	15.7
Anubis	20	50%	1.23	15.9
Vertigo	12	67%	1.14	14.9
Nuke	11	73%	1.19	14.4
Mirage	9	67%	1.63	19.3
Train	7	71%	1.16	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

47.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.6%Spray accuracy

90.8%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

586msReaction time

37.0%T opening success

55.0%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

7.4%Flash assists

2.93HE damage / grenade

4.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.037% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–4	-0.05	14%	27 Aug →
overpass	4–6	-0.02	0%	27 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.00	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.09	14%	26 Aug →
overpass	13–7	0.01	9%	26 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.12	38%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	5%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.08	10%	24 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	24%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–2	0.16	33%	23 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	17%	23 Aug →
office	13–11	0.09	14%	23 Aug →
overpass	12–12	0.07	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	10%	23 Aug →
train	4–13	0.02	20%	23 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.09	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.08	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.14	27%	23 Aug →
vertigo	6–7	0.13	31%	23 Aug →
shelter	10–13	0.03	6%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	13%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.04	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	11%	22 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	13%	22 Aug →
train	2–6	0.00	9%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	25%	21 Aug →
debris	9–5	0.11	19%	21 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	5%	21 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.07	22%	21 Aug →
office	13–4	-0.04	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	10%	21 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	0.03	16%	21 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	18%	21 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	7%	21 Aug →
mirage	0–7	-0.04	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
shelter	13–2	0.14	20%	20 Aug →
office	13–10	0.04	9%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.02	13%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.12	13%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–2	-0.03	12%	18 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	16%	18 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.06	11%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.08	16%	18 Aug →
office	13–4	-0.01	13%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	11%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.10	14%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	8%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.01	18%	15 Aug →
shelter	9–13	0.03	12%	15 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	19%	15 Aug →
overpass	5–3	0.08	22%	15 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.15	13%	15 Aug →
train	13–11	0.06	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	13%	14 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	10%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	17%	14 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.04	11%	14 Aug →
vertigo	4–13	-0.01	35%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	11%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.12	12%	13 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	0.09	33%	13 Aug →
office	13–8	-0.05	18%	13 Aug →
vertigo	5–2	-0.06	36%	13 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	25%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	10%	12 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	18%	12 Aug →
office	7–13	-0.02	21%	12 Aug →
train	5–13	-0.07	3%	12 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.05	5%	11 Aug →
mirage	0–6	-0.06	0%	11 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.08	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	21%	11 Aug →
overpass	4–3	-0.03	24%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	16%	7 Aug →
office	13–4	0.06	17%	6 Aug →
overpass	6–13	-0.01	18%	6 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	9%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.07	38%	6 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.05	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	17%	4 Aug →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	23%	4 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.12	12%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	13%	4 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.05	18%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	18%	4 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.01	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	19%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	35%	3 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	29%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	16%	3 Aug →
train	10–13	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	30%	2 Aug →