nizzymad — CS2 Stats

76561198099584840[U:1:139319112]

963Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,345 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnizzymadFACEITLevel 6 · 1,345 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning47
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateWWWLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression5.2
Utility6.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time623ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — inferno 9–4
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
812In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2591636%-0.01
ancientD1751229%-0.01
nukeB147750%0.02
infernoA148657%0.02
dust2B137654%0.00
overpassC94544%0.01
trainS54180%0.01
anubis220100%0.00
cache110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches
48%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
83.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2065%1.2618.1
Ancient1030%0.9615.6
Inferno825%0.9114.8
Nuke838%0.9816.3
Dust2743%1.1618.0
Overpass580%1.2819.0
Anubis10%1.1721.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
627msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
9.35HE damage / grenade
10.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3383% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–20.1016%2 May
overpass13–20.1322%26 Apr
nuke13–40.1218%26 Apr
mirage8–130.0118%10 Feb
ancient11–130.0414%10 Feb
nuke8–130.0620%4 Feb
mirage4–130.0023%4 Feb
dust26–13-0.0318%29 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0615%29 Jan
anubis13–7-0.019%29 Jan
dust214–16-0.0315%27 Jan
overpass15–150.0610%27 Jan
anubis13–110.0122%27 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0315%27 Jan
ancient13–10-0.023%26 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0321%25 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0610%25 Jan
mirage13–90.0016%25 Jan
mirage13–110.0224%25 Jan
dust213–60.0116%25 Jan
ancient13–100.0625%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0311%22 Jan
nuke17–19-0.0213%19 Jan
ancient11–130.0113%18 Jan
overpass16–140.0114%18 Jan
mirage12–16-0.0119%11 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0115%11 Jan
mirage10–130.0220%11 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0214%11 Jan
nuke2–9-0.1516%10 Jan
inferno9–40.2626%10 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0022%7 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0129%7 Jan
overpass13–60.0523%6 Jan
overpass16–14-0.0013%5 Jan
ancient12–16-0.0710%2 Jan
train13–100.018%2 Jan
inferno12–120.0725%2 Jan
nuke5–130.0819%2 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0013%2 Jan
dust213–110.038%2 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0412%1 Jan
dust216–140.0220%1 Jan
dust213–7-0.0113%31 Dec
train13–6-0.0014%31 Dec
inferno13–50.1223%31 Dec
mirage6–13-0.117%31 Dec
nuke13–70.1019%31 Dec
ancient13–16-0.078%29 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0315%29 Dec
dust213–20.089%29 Dec
inferno10–40.0027%29 Dec
ancient8–130.0015%29 Dec
overpass15–15-0.0123%29 Dec
inferno13–70.089%28 Dec
overpass7–13-0.066%28 Dec
dust211–13-0.0620%28 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0216%28 Dec
mirage15–150.0119%28 Dec
train0–13-0.0620%27 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0011%27 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0817%27 Dec
dust211–130.0114%27 Dec
mirage13–110.0217%27 Dec
mirage6–13-0.086%27 Dec
nuke13–90.0022%27 Dec
mirage13–20.0121%27 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0213%27 Dec
ancient13–9-0.0415%27 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0619%27 Dec
train13–80.0410%27 Dec
inferno2–13-0.0919%26 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0514%26 Dec
mirage14–16-0.009%26 Dec
dust213–50.0222%26 Dec
dust25–13-0.0424%26 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0328%24 Dec
dust211–130.0833%22 Dec
nuke13–30.0433%22 Dec
inferno13–50.0318%22 Dec
mirage15–150.0118%22 Dec
inferno13–100.0225%22 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0116%21 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0114%21 Dec
nuke13–00.0310%21 Dec
dust213–8-0.0819%21 Dec
inferno13–80.0113%21 Dec
mirage13–30.0911%21 Dec
mirage13–60.0115%21 Dec
nuke13–50.0727%21 Dec
nuke13–100.039%21 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0818%20 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0116%20 Dec
ancient1–13-0.0118%20 Dec
ancient13–40.0525%20 Dec
mirage13–50.0526%20 Dec
ancient13–90.0313%20 Dec
train13–80.0815%20 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0412%20 Dec
ancient13–16-0.0211%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →