Krocan

Krocan — CS2 Stats

PS76561198092566942[U:1:132301214]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,618Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,455Purple band · top ~26.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15978 of 25954 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,258 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKrocanFACEITLevel 7 · 1,258 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,455 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning50
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression4.3
Utility6.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time612ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 13–2
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2314961%0.02
dust2C2191243%-0.00
mirageS1611569%0.00
cacheD134931%-0.01
anubisA127558%0.00
ancientD72529%-0.03
nukeB63350%0.01
vertigo2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

249Matches
53%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
71.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6248%0.9714.5
Dust23765%1.0115.0
Inferno3551%0.9713.9
Anubis3551%1.0515.7
Ancient2065%0.8714.3
Nuke1631%0.8213.4
Vertigo1060%1.0615.5
Cache838%0.8311.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
613msReaction time
30.1%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
13.01HE damage / grenade
11.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.1279% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0217%29 Aug
vertigo11–130.0418%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0021%27 Aug
nuke13–10.0731%27 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0418%26 Aug
nuke5–13-0.014%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0213%22 Aug
dust213–90.0724%22 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0525%20 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0323%20 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1011%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.0415%20 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0831%19 Aug
anubis13–160.0013%19 Aug
dust215–15-0.0517%19 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0217%16 Aug
dust213–90.0313%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0318%16 Aug
nuke4–130.0123%16 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0422%16 Aug
cache13–70.0325%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0333%15 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0416%15 Aug
mirage16–140.0014%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0525%14 Aug
cache6–13-0.0615%14 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0119%14 Aug
dust213–90.0318%14 Aug
mirage13–80.0210%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0224%14 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0215%12 Aug
dust215–15-0.0119%12 Aug
mirage16–130.0424%11 Aug
anubis19–150.0217%10 Aug
inferno13–70.0423%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0518%9 Aug
mirage13–00.014%9 Aug
cache14–16-0.0318%8 Aug
dust27–130.0928%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0810%8 Aug
ancient13–110.0219%8 Aug
cache13–9-0.0222%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0425%8 Aug
inferno13–80.0419%8 Aug
dust213–70.0714%8 Aug
dust213–100.0211%8 Aug
dust213–90.0617%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0510%7 Aug
anubis16–190.0313%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0426%6 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%6 Aug
vertigo14–160.0111%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0225%6 Aug
anubis16–120.0217%5 Aug
inferno9–130.0216%31 Jul
cache3–130.0120%31 Jul
nuke13–40.017%29 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0320%29 Jul
dust213–2-0.0120%29 Jul
inferno13–40.0518%29 Jul
inferno10–130.026%28 Jul
cache13–1-0.0714%28 Jul
cache13–30.0616%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0011%28 Jul
inferno13–20.1018%26 Jul
inferno11–130.0416%26 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0014%26 Jul
anubis9–30.0424%26 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0316%26 Jul
mirage13–100.022%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0213%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.037%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0710%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0519%25 Jul
inferno13–90.1024%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0820%25 Jul
dust213–40.0633%25 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0230%24 Jul
cache15–15-0.0014%24 Jul
inferno13–80.0715%24 Jul
inferno13–40.0428%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.077%23 Jul
mirage0–13-0.069%23 Jul
cache8–13-0.0214%23 Jul
dust24–13-0.068%23 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0322%23 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0611%23 Jul
cache5–130.0120%22 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0320%22 Jul
inferno8–130.0426%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0616%22 Jul
cache11–13-0.0117%22 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0516%15 Jul
mirage13–90.0721%15 Jul
dust214–16-0.0321%15 Jul
anubis13–80.0816%14 Jul
dust26–13-0.0616%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0018%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0517%13 Jul
dust216–140.0111%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →