Deq

Deq — CS2 Stats

AU76561198090928465[U:1:130662737]Steam profile ↗

1,141Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,121 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDeqFACEITLevel 5 · 1,121 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning45
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression3.8
Utility5.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time614ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–6
133Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA36201656%0.01
dust2B178947%-0.01
cacheB105550%0.01
ancientD91811%-0.03
infernoS86275%0.01
anubisC83538%-0.00
nukeA74357%0.05
overpassC52340%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

491Matches
49%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
73.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12651%1.1215.1
Dust211450%1.1514.9
Inferno5558%1.3716.3
Ancient5137%0.9815.1
Nuke3749%1.3116.2
Anubis3647%1.1815.5
Cache1953%1.1715.4
Overpass1644%1.1815.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
613msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–30.1221%21 Aug
dust213–8-0.0133%20 Aug
cache9–130.0117%16 Aug
mirage7–130.0326%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0928%14 Aug
dust210–130.0112%13 Aug
mirage10–130.0121%12 Aug
dust23–13-0.078%9 Aug
mirage9–130.0119%9 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0518%8 Aug
dust210–130.0218%4 Aug
cache13–60.0021%29 Jul
dust26–13-0.086%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0018%28 Jul
dust212–12-0.0117%27 Jul
dust215–19-0.0316%26 Jul
cache6–130.0121%26 Jul
inferno16–120.0010%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0711%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0617%24 Jul
mirage13–160.036%24 Jul
mirage13–100.0215%24 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0326%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0321%22 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0212%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0115%12 Jul
cache6–130.0111%12 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0330%12 Jul
mirage8–130.0425%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0324%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0624%10 Jul
overpass11–130.033%10 Jul
mirage13–80.1519%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.0016%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0120%10 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0511%10 Jul
dust215–15-0.0115%9 Jul
cache16–14-0.0411%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.056%8 Jul
cache13–60.1621%8 Jul
mirage13–110.0112%8 Jul
dust213–40.1024%8 Jul
dust216–14-0.0227%8 Jul
mirage11–130.0317%7 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0418%7 Jul
inferno13–40.0729%7 Jul
mirage11–130.0319%7 Jul
anubis13–90.1214%6 Jul
ancient9–13-0.048%6 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0517%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0318%6 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0320%6 Jul
nuke13–16-0.038%6 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0311%6 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0323%4 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0322%4 Jul
inferno13–40.0631%4 Jul
anubis17–19-0.0412%2 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0423%2 Jul
nuke5–00.1657%2 Jul
mirage16–130.0011%1 Jul
dust213–80.0036%1 Jul
dust210–13-0.0332%28 Jun
mirage13–160.0314%28 Jun
anubis13–80.0812%28 Jun
dust213–30.0627%28 Jun
mirage13–40.024%27 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0518%26 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0117%26 Jun
cache13–80.0224%26 Jun
dust213–5-0.057%26 Jun
dust213–7-0.0411%25 Jun
inferno13–80.0424%25 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0612%24 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0419%24 Jun
overpass10–130.0416%23 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0516%23 Jun
overpass13–110.0628%23 Jun
inferno11–13-0.039%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0218%21 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0221%21 Jun
inferno13–100.0519%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0222%20 Jun
overpass19–16-0.0114%19 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0123%19 Jun
mirage13–40.0821%19 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0122%19 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0416%18 Jun
dust214–16-0.0019%17 Jun
dust213–10-0.0432%17 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0522%15 Jun
cache2–13-0.0212%15 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0310%15 Jun
mirage8–130.0618%13 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0212%13 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0713%12 Jun
mirage13–90.0717%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0113%12 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0721%12 Jun
nuke13–60.1314%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →