LochNessMolester — CS2 Stats

76561198090180797[U:1:129915069]✓ No bans

367Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating9,118Light Blue band · top ~59.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6189 of 8366 tracked
FaceitLevel 2 · 624 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLochNessMolesterFACEITLevel 2 · 624 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER9,118 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning45
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression2.8
Utility5.7
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 689ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time690ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 701ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 11.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — office 13–10
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113862%-0.01
mirageA1911858%-0.03
nukeA169756%-0.02
ancientB115645%-0.02
cacheB115645%-0.01
infernoS107370%0.01
anubis42250%0.02
office43175%0.09
vertigo330100%0.06
overpass1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
55.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10%0.8214.0
Dust21100%0.578.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
689msReaction time
23.4%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
13.6%Flash assists
9.64HE damage / grenade
7.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.3296% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.402% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–130.018%27 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0511%27 Aug
ancient8–130.006%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0522%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.014%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.027%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0213%15 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0720%15 Aug
mirage5–20.0417%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.035%15 Aug
cache4–130.0514%15 Aug
dust213–20.0220%13 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0319%13 Aug
inferno13–80.0111%13 Aug
cache13–9-0.0110%13 Aug
cache10–13-0.023%11 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0613%11 Aug
nuke13–10-0.019%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0513%9 Aug
inferno8–130.0215%9 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0115%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0813%8 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0619%8 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0212%7 Aug
anubis13–90.039%7 Aug
inferno13–50.039%30 Jul
inferno13–40.067%30 Jul
vertigo13–70.0520%29 Jul
vertigo13–60.1818%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.0814%25 Jul
inferno9–130.0315%25 Jul
mirage13–80.009%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.0013%23 Jul
dust210–13-0.0414%23 Jul
anubis13–100.057%22 Jul
cache13–90.009%17 Jul
office13–100.2713%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0213%9 Jul
cache9–130.0414%9 Jul
office13–40.0310%9 Jul
office13–90.019%8 Jul
office3–130.0510%8 Jul
anubis3–130.029%2 Jul
mirage13–8-0.076%2 Jul
dust211–13-0.0412%24 Jun
dust213–20.0211%17 Jun
dust213–40.0416%17 Jun
ancient13–50.0313%10 Jun
dust213–90.0220%10 Jun
dust214–16-0.0118%8 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0310%1 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0311%1 Jun
dust210–13-0.025%1 Jun
mirage13–8-0.048%28 May
inferno13–50.0212%28 May
nuke13–10-0.026%28 May
inferno13–9-0.0226%27 May
ancient13–10-0.0215%24 May
mirage5–13-0.053%24 May
nuke11–13-0.0310%22 May
mirage13–10-0.0110%22 May
mirage13–11-0.0213%20 May
nuke10–13-0.0015%20 May
dust213–11-0.0710%20 May
ancient10–13-0.038%14 May
mirage13–2-0.0517%14 May
mirage10–13-0.0217%12 May
cache9–13-0.058%12 May
cache13–6-0.0412%12 May
cache0–2-0.000%12 May
cache13–40.0221%2 May
nuke13–60.0112%2 May
cache13–9-0.0512%29 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0613%28 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0017%28 Apr
dust213–70.039%28 Apr
inferno13–9-0.034%28 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0316%28 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0310%28 Apr
vertigo13–10-0.0313%27 Apr
nuke16–120.0220%26 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0216%26 Apr
ancient11–130.0315%24 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0126%24 Apr
dust25–13-0.1110%22 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0210%22 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0414%20 Apr
inferno13–80.016%20 Apr
dust213–9-0.0016%20 Apr
dust213–60.0411%20 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0312%17 Apr
ancient10–13-0.065%15 Apr
mirage13–100.035%14 Apr
dust213–100.069%14 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0614%14 Apr
mirage2–13-0.075%14 Apr
dust213–70.0519%14 Apr
nuke13–110.0014%13 Apr
mirage13–3-0.010%13 Apr
dust213–10-0.0314%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →