Tatankah89

Tatankah89 — CS2 Stats

US76561198083783275[U:1:123517547]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,189Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
Premier CS Rating16,828Purple band · top ~21.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8197 of 13816 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 780 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTatankah89FACEITLevel 3 · 780 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,828 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning41
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression4.7
Utility5.6
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time630ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 630ms
Headshot accuracy12.0%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–3
132Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 21ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%-0.02
dust2A2112957%-0.02
nukeB179853%0.00
ancientD124833%-0.03
infernoC114736%-0.00
cacheC94544%-0.02
anubisC73443%-0.00
overpass110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
33%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
69.6ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1030%0.7711.2
Dust2838%1.0616.1
Ancient633%0.718.7
Inferno450%0.9618.8
Nuke333%1.0514.3
Anubis333%0.9519.3
Vertigo10%0.477.0
Overpass10%1.3523.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
627msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
7.84HE damage / grenade
6.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.2739% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2229% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.024%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0315%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0610%23 Aug
anubis9–130.0410%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0315%23 Aug
ancient13–20.053%22 Aug
mirage13–5-0.038%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0214%22 Aug
cache13–60.019%20 Aug
nuke11–130.015%19 Aug
anubis13–110.038%17 Aug
inferno12–160.0313%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.0120%15 Aug
cache15–15-0.0219%15 Aug
dust213–9-0.024%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0222%14 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0810%13 Aug
dust27–13-0.0217%10 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0116%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0712%9 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0413%8 Aug
cache9–13-0.029%8 Aug
cache13–16-0.0312%7 Aug
dust216–13-0.0312%7 Aug
cache16–13-0.0018%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.039%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0318%5 Aug
mirage16–130.0214%5 Aug
ancient3–13-0.080%2 Aug
dust213–7-0.0119%2 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0210%1 Aug
nuke13–110.0216%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0214%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0712%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0116%30 Jul
mirage6–13-0.048%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.097%29 Jul
cache16–120.0211%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0111%28 Jul
cache8–13-0.0710%28 Jul
nuke10–130.0315%27 Jul
ancient10–13-0.057%27 Jul
mirage11–130.0010%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.099%19 Jul
inferno13–70.038%19 Jul
nuke15–150.0017%18 Jul
ancient16–120.003%17 Jul
mirage16–13-0.078%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0320%15 Jul
ancient8–130.0311%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0217%14 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0112%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.017%11 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0111%11 Jul
cache13–9-0.039%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0412%5 Jul
mirage9–13-0.017%5 Jul
nuke15–15-0.008%3 Jul
mirage13–40.0412%3 Jul
anubis13–80.028%29 Jun
dust213–11-0.016%28 Jun
nuke11–13-0.064%27 Jun
ancient13–9-0.034%23 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0018%21 Jun
nuke13–90.0325%2 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0110%1 Jun
dust213–60.0610%31 May
mirage8–13-0.078%31 May
dust22–13-0.098%31 May
inferno12–16-0.067%30 May
inferno5–13-0.067%29 May
nuke13–20.074%29 May
dust211–13-0.0413%29 May
anubis6–13-0.043%29 May
dust213–10-0.0814%28 May
dust29–130.0316%28 May
overpass13–9-0.0517%26 May
mirage13–4-0.035%26 May
nuke13–9-0.035%26 May
mirage13–40.068%24 May
inferno13–70.027%24 May
dust216–140.0620%24 May
ancient8–13-0.1014%23 May
dust211–130.0112%23 May
anubis11–13-0.0110%23 May
dust213–8-0.0413%23 May
dust28–13-0.054%22 May
dust213–7-0.0210%22 May
nuke5–13-0.0413%22 May
mirage7–130.0116%20 May
nuke13–8-0.0013%20 May
nuke13–30.1431%19 May
nuke13–90.0413%19 May
mirage9–130.0215%19 May
inferno13–20.058%18 May
inferno13–20.0911%18 May
ancient10–13-0.0110%17 May
dust213–100.0120%16 May
anubis2–13-0.0512%16 May
inferno10–13-0.0711%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →