WarrenSC2 — CS2 Stats

US76561198073802255[U:1:113536527]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,441Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 Developing

CSDB Leaderboard#36784 of 39988 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,893Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,893
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 108 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45

Positioning58

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateWLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5

Aggression5.9

Utility6.0

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5

Positioning5.8

Utility6.0

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time651ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms

Headshot accuracy19.0%−2.2%

first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

19Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 57% over 30overpassWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	40	19–21	48%	-0.00
dust2	A	30	17–13	57%	0.00
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
overpass	C	8	3–5	38%	0.00
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.01
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,030Matches

49%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

73.0ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	302	50%	1.03	15.0
Dust2	211	49%	0.98	14.9
Ancient	103	58%	0.98	14.8
Anubis	58	45%	1.06	14.9
Overpass	39	46%	1.08	16.2
Train	22	36%	1.07	15.3
Inferno	11	55%	1.51	14.4
Vertigo	9	33%	0.94	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

75.0%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

650msReaction time

29.3%T opening success

42.8%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

9.28HE damage / grenade

15.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.2938% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	16–14	-0.00	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	25%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	15%	28 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	38%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.02	26%	19 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	15%	14 May →
cache	13–9	0.00	17%	7 May →
mirage	7–13	0.00	19%	7 May →
overpass	13–9	-0.06	21%	7 May →
overpass	5–13	-0.01	24%	6 May →
cache	13–16	-0.00	23%	30 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	9%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.03	18%	16 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.00	16%	10 Apr →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	33%	9 Apr →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	33%	9 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	18%	9 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	17%	31 Mar →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	14%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	10%	29 Mar →
dust2	19–17	0.00	12%	29 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	25%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.02	12%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	13%	26 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.01	9%	25 Mar →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	35%	25 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	22%	18 Mar →
dust2	19–22	-0.04	27%	15 Mar →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	13%	14 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.07	20%	11 Mar →
dust2	13–1	0.11	4%	10 Mar →
dust2	5–13	0.04	23%	10 Mar →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	15%	9 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.00	20%	7 Mar →
ancient	14–16	0.04	15%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–1	0.02	26%	4 Mar →
dust2	13–5	0.06	16%	4 Mar →
dust2	9–13	0.04	17%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.04	27%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	20%	26 Feb →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	13%	23 Feb →
dust2	6–13	0.01	34%	21 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.04	21%	15 Feb →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	19%	14 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.06	16%	10 Feb →
dust2	9–13	0.03	39%	7 Feb →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	28%	3 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	21%	31 Jan →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	37%	31 Jan →
ancient	16–13	0.08	10%	31 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.05	22%	31 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	22 Jan →
anubis	13–2	0.08	13%	19 Jan →
ancient	13–9	0.09	19%	19 Jan →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	23%	19 Jan →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	21%	19 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.03	21%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.01	30%	16 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.02	21%	10 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.06	16%	8 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	19%	6 Jan →
ancient	12–16	0.00	0%	6 Jan →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	13%	6 Jan →
mirage	13–1	0.06	23%	1 Jan →
dust2	13–10	0.02	28%	31 Dec →
overpass	13–11	0.06	16%	31 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	28%	30 Dec →
overpass	13–7	0.06	28%	30 Dec →
ancient	16–14	0.01	16%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	20%	30 Dec →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	20%	26 Dec →
dust2	13–9	0.06	16%	26 Dec →
mirage	16–14	0.01	22%	26 Dec →
mirage	16–13	0.00	20%	26 Dec →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	26%	24 Dec →
overpass	9–13	0.03	18%	23 Dec →
overpass	11–13	-0.00	14%	21 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	25%	19 Dec →
ancient	13–2	0.07	12%	19 Dec →
overpass	8–13	-0.04	19%	18 Dec →
nuke	13–4	0.01	24%	16 Dec →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	18%	15 Dec →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	15%	15 Dec →
inferno	3–13	0.04	21%	8 Dec →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	8 Dec →
mirage	11–13	0.03	10%	8 Dec →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	24%	7 Dec →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	26%	7 Dec →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	32%	28 Nov →
office	13–7	0.02	27%	28 Nov →
dust2	2–13	0.03	14%	28 Nov →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	28%	28 Nov →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	22%	24 Nov →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	31%	24 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.04	28%	22 Nov →
dust2	12–16	-0.02	20%	22 Nov →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	29%	22 Nov →
mirage	15–15	0.01	10%	21 Nov →