LuXze — CS2 Stats

76561198065929734[U:1:105664006]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,408Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,562Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4004 of 13301 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,047 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning56

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLWLWTLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression6.9

Utility5.1

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.6

Utility5.1

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time573ms−26ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%−0.0%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6cacheWeakest map · 33% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	34	20–14	59%	0.01
ancient	A	26	16–10	62%	0.02
cache	D	21	7–14	33%	-0.00
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
dust2	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.05
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,435Matches

50%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

82.6ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	572	53%	1.14	17.1
Ancient	269	52%	1.19	17.3
Anubis	228	51%	1.14	17.5
Inferno	63	38%	1.03	16.1
Overpass	54	54%	1.21	18.2
Nuke	40	48%	0.96	15.4
Dust2	38	45%	0.98	15.6
Cache	30	30%	1.01	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.1%Spray accuracy

76.6%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

562msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

57.2%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

7.89HE damage / grenade

7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.7312% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.05	15%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.12	11%	27 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	11%	25 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.00	19%	25 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	12%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	28%	22 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.01	8%	19 Aug →
cache	19–16	0.01	15%	16 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	10%	15 Aug →
mirage	19–16	-0.00	23%	15 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	18%	14 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.00	22%	14 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	-0.07	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	19–15	0.06	15%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	13%	9 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	10%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	12%	9 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.00	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	12%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	31%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.04	16%	31 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.09	13%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.09	10%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	16%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	32%	30 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	18%	28 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	16%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	12%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	9%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	16%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	11%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–0	0.08	5%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	14%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	16%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	12%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	14%	23 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	16%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	11%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	4%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.03	22%	18 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.02	13%	18 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	18%	18 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.08	24%	18 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.12	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.12	23%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.09	19%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.08	13%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	18%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	11%	17 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	12%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	17%	14 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	13%	14 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	22%	13 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.06	24%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	23%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	23%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.05	20%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.08	23%	9 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	31%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	15%	5 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.06	25%	4 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	17%	4 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.03	14%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	8%	3 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	18%	2 Jul →
cache	15–19	-0.02	12%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	3%	28 Jun →
inferno	16–12	0.06	18%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.13	16%	28 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	8%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	23%	27 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	9%	27 Jun →
ancient	1–13	-0.07	24%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–1	-0.00	16%	26 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	15%	26 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	13%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.13	26%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.00	16%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.03	15%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.20	18%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.11	19%	25 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	16%	23 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.05	13%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.06	25%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.05	8%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.08	22%	20 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	19%	19 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	9%	19 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.01	19%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.09	23%	18 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	20%	18 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.02	12%	18 Jun →