SleepyShaman

SleepyShaman — CS2 Stats

US76561198056232369[U:1:95966641]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

712Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating13,259Blue band · top ~37.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30811 of 46836 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSleepyShamanPREMIER13,259 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning42
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateLWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.6
Aggression2.3
Utility6.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 29% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time533ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 5–0
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA1911858%0.01
mirageA1811761%-0.00
nukeS1611569%-0.02
ancientC1661038%0.01
anubisB158753%-0.00
infernoB63350%0.02
dust2B63350%-0.04
vertigo31233%0.05
train1010%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
80%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
51.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache1100%0.6911.0
Dust21100%0.505.0
Anubis1100%1.2714.0
Mirage1100%1.3811.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
28.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.8%Spray accuracy
67.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
533msReaction time
14.2%T opening success
29.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
4.83HE damage / grenade
14.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.2027% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0210%26 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0631%26 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0411%25 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0110%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.026%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0110%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0419%20 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0419%20 Aug
cache13–40.0413%19 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0824%19 Aug
cache9–130.0320%17 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0416%16 Aug
cache13–50.0127%15 Aug
ancient8–130.0224%15 Aug
cache13–80.0110%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0513%15 Aug
ancient13–100.0415%15 Aug
anubis13–50.0510%15 Aug
cache13–20.1116%15 Aug
inferno14–160.0417%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0726%15 Aug
cache12–12-0.0116%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0125%15 Aug
ancient8–20.0413%15 Aug
anubis13–8-0.094%15 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0514%15 Aug
cache13–8-0.0013%15 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0117%14 Aug
nuke11–2-0.0417%14 Aug
mirage13–10.028%14 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0325%14 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0811%14 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0018%14 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0322%14 Aug
train8–130.0015%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.0115%14 Aug
nuke3–13-0.118%14 Aug
nuke16–130.0311%9 Aug
ancient13–100.0313%9 Aug
dust213–8-0.0118%9 Aug
cache5–13-0.0113%9 Aug
inferno13–8-0.064%9 Aug
ancient13–160.0215%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0614%9 Aug
cache11–13-0.0320%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0727%8 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0212%8 Aug
anubis14–16-0.049%8 Aug
nuke13–110.0620%8 Aug
dust213–6-0.0213%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0914%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0816%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0011%8 Aug
inferno5–00.1938%8 Aug
ancient13–100.0117%8 Aug
cache10–130.0116%8 Aug
mirage12–12-0.028%8 Aug
anubis11–130.0315%8 Aug
ancient13–90.049%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0321%8 Aug
cache13–80.0418%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0219%5 Aug
anubis13–100.0520%5 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0121%3 Aug
cache13–160.0313%2 Aug
nuke13–3-0.048%2 Aug
mirage11–130.037%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0115%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0214%1 Aug
nuke13–10.109%31 Jul
dust20–7-0.088%31 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0610%31 Jul
mirage13–40.0514%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0311%30 Jul
vertigo1–80.017%28 Jul
cache9–13-0.017%27 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0316%26 Jul
cache9–10.0733%26 Jul
vertigo12–120.1016%26 Jul
ancient12–120.047%26 Jul
inferno13–30.086%26 Jul
anubis9–130.039%25 Jul
anubis13–90.0515%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0214%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0514%25 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0115%25 Jul
anubis13–6-0.010%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0213%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.077%25 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0215%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0116%25 Jul
mirage13–10.0411%25 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0822%25 Jul
dust212–12-0.0314%25 Jul
vertigo13–110.0510%25 Jul
cache13–30.0510%25 Jul
ancient9–130.0210%25 Jul
cache13–9-0.0222%25 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0711%25 Jul
anubis13–20.1214%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →