VeelZ

VeelZ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198050204425[U:1:89938697]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

736Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,583Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27068 of 59743 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,382 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVeelZFACEITLevel 7 · 1,382 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,583 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning47
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47467Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression5.2
Utility4.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 42% on T to 24% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time648ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — cache 13–5
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%-0.01
infernoC1981142%0.00
mirageC1771041%-0.02
nukeS1510567%-0.02
ancientD1441029%-0.02
cacheS64267%0.04
train32167%-0.03
anubis21150%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,475Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
67.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4245%0.8714.2
Dust22748%0.8814.1
Inferno2556%0.8112.8
Nuke2162%0.9014.9
Ancient1747%0.7012.1
Anubis743%0.9014.1
Vertigo20%0.7513.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
649msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
24.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
5.90HE damage / grenade
5.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 24.4286% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.066%10 Jun
cache13–50.0621%8 Jun
cache13–90.1019%5 Jun
cache5–130.0134%7 May
cache13–100.0313%30 Apr
cache13–50.1026%29 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0325%26 Apr
inferno13–70.0427%25 Apr
dust28–13-0.0529%21 Apr
mirage1–13-0.069%16 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0629%9 Apr
ancient14–160.0315%6 Apr
mirage13–2-0.0426%24 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0418%8 Mar
mirage3–130.0229%3 Mar
nuke13–20.0425%21 Feb
ancient10–7-0.0431%13 Feb
mirage10–13-0.028%7 Feb
inferno13–80.0228%7 Feb
ancient15–150.0114%7 Feb
inferno7–130.017%7 Feb
dust27–130.0624%6 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0212%6 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0216%6 Feb
nuke13–5-0.0622%6 Feb
dust28–13-0.0210%5 Feb
dust213–90.0515%5 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0129%5 Feb
inferno15–150.0310%5 Feb
dust212–16-0.0319%4 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0315%4 Feb
dust25–13-0.0710%4 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0229%4 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0426%4 Feb
ancient5–13-0.069%3 Feb
dust24–13-0.0338%3 Feb
inferno10–13-0.019%3 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0223%3 Feb
mirage13–50.0316%3 Feb
dust213–2-0.0413%3 Feb
dust22–13-0.0521%2 Feb
ancient9–130.0420%2 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0116%2 Feb
inferno13–20.049%2 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0115%2 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0213%31 Jan
dust213–30.0521%31 Jan
ancient11–130.0113%31 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0324%31 Jan
dust213–100.0621%29 Jan
nuke3–130.0522%28 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0520%21 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0516%21 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0714%21 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0223%19 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0031%13 Jan
nuke16–14-0.0215%27 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0426%19 Nov
mirage13–5-0.1115%7 Nov
dust27–130.0116%27 Oct
ancient16–130.0017%26 Oct
ancient9–13-0.0719%26 Oct
train10–13-0.0632%26 Oct
train13–30.0114%24 Oct
nuke13–9-0.0438%2 Oct
ancient11–13-0.0414%2 Oct
inferno7–13-0.0021%1 Oct
mirage13–60.0917%1 Oct
ancient3–13-0.0124%1 Oct
dust213–100.0136%1 Oct
dust213–30.0312%28 Sept
dust27–13-0.0327%25 Sept
dust213–3-0.078%25 Sept
inferno13–40.0115%25 Sept
dust213–9-0.0127%24 Sept
nuke13–90.017%24 Sept
dust29–130.0120%23 Sept
train16–13-0.0217%23 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0513%23 Sept
dust213–40.0526%22 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0233%22 Sept
inferno12–140.0521%18 Sept
inferno11–130.0118%17 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0230%14 Sept
inferno13–110.0327%14 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0113%13 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0611%13 Sept
dust215–15-0.0617%13 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0125%13 Sept
overpass9–13-0.0819%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0120%9 Aug
mirage13–20.0248%9 Aug
inferno6–130.0120%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0515%13 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0323%11 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0326%9 Jul
dust213–2-0.0423%9 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0116%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0318%4 Jul
dust213–40.0616%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →