tyler — CS2 Stats

76561198041362941[U:1:81097213]

2,137Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,404Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning42

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateWLLWWLWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression4.0

Utility6.6

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.4

Clutch6.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning4.2

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels0.8

Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time577ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–8

13–1Biggest win — overpass

3Longest win streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5overpassWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
nuke	D	22	7–15	32%	-0.01
cache	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.02
ancient	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.02
inferno	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
overpass	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.02
dust2	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
anubis	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

283Matches

51%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

70.5ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win

6%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	29	45%	0.93	13.0
Mirage	22	64%	0.90	13.4
Anubis	20	70%	0.90	11.7
Ancient	19	58%	1.00	14.5
Overpass	17	59%	0.90	12.1
Inferno	10	30%	0.98	15.1
Dust2	8	62%	1.08	13.3
Vertigo	6	33%	1.00	14.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.8%Spray accuracy

84.9%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

571msReaction time

26.4%T opening success

36.7%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

5.1%Flash assists

12.69HE damage / grenade

10.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.4172% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	0.01	21%	26 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	16%	26 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	14%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	30%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	13%	17 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.00	16%	16 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	33%	16 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.11	0%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	19%	15 Aug →
nuke	6–9	-0.02	25%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	18%	14 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	9%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	3%	13 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.05	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	17%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	29%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	15%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	36%	9 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	30%	8 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	30%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	23%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	26%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.04	26%	5 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	21%	4 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.01	17%	2 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	13%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	6%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.03	14%	29 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.03	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	25%	24 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.04	18%	24 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.07	8%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.10	23%	21 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	24%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.04	27%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	23%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.01	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.08	14%	18 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	21%	15 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.07	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	28%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	19%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	6%	13 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	20%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.05	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	15%	10 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	17%	10 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	17%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.04	16%	7 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.10	8%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	27%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	11%	2 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	22%	2 Jul →
overpass	6–13	-0.04	18%	30 Jun →
overpass	14–16	0.06	26%	28 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.07	12%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	32%	24 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	19%	20 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.02	13%	20 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.03	9%	20 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	24%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.05	18%	18 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	10%	18 Jun →
inferno	12–16	-0.02	22%	17 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	14%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	27%	17 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	14%	16 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	25%	16 Jun →
overpass	5–13	-0.07	6%	15 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.01	27%	15 Jun →
overpass	7–13	-0.06	20%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.03	31%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	29%	11 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.03	26%	11 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.01	20%	11 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	16%	10 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	24%	9 Jun →
overpass	13–1	0.04	33%	8 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	14%	8 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.08	11%	8 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.04	12%	7 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	38%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	26%	7 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	16%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.05	31%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.03	13%	5 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	21%	3 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.01	21%	3 Jun →
ancient	16–14	0.03	16%	1 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.02	20%	29 May →