DoF| Jamma

DoF| Jamma — CS2 Stats

US76561198030130871[U:1:69865143]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,050Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,608Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2929 of 9451 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,611 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDoF| JammaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,611 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,608 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44497Last 10044%Win rateWWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression7.5
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch6.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 11–13
131Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 12cacheWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2061430%-0.01
mirageB1991047%-0.00
infernoB179853%-0.01
dust2S129375%-0.00
ancientD123925%-0.01
anubisA85363%-0.00
cacheD71614%0.01
overpass42250%0.03
vertigo1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

71Matches
58%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
92.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1839%1.1716.6
Ancient1080%1.3216.1
Nuke1050%1.1218.3
Dust2888%0.9616.3
Inferno850%1.1716.8
Overpass743%0.9915.9
Vertigo367%1.1914.7
Anubis2100%0.8819.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
559msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
60.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
15.34HE damage / grenade
4.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0212% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–140.0617%27 Aug
anubis13–50.0324%27 Aug
dust213–80.0111%27 Aug
inferno16–140.139%27 Aug
nuke13–70.0116%27 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0124%27 Aug
mirage13–50.1242%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0712%27 Aug
nuke6–130.0121%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0534%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0228%26 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0420%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0016%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0219%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0310%25 Aug
cache7–130.0121%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0214%24 Aug
mirage10–130.028%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0218%24 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0111%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0414%22 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0321%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.1016%21 Aug
mirage13–60.0013%19 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0613%19 Aug
cache11–13-0.0413%19 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0122%19 Aug
cache15–15-0.0322%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0123%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0217%19 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0022%19 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0210%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0514%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0111%19 Aug
dust26–13-0.0115%19 Aug
cache16–130.0211%16 Aug
cache2–130.0113%12 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0216%5 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0833%18 Jul
mirage3–13-0.039%1 Jul
dust28–1-0.0211%1 Jul
ancient6–130.0631%1 Jul
anubis13–16-0.038%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0721%17 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0412%17 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0125%17 Jun
nuke3–13-0.068%17 Jun
inferno9–30.0827%17 Jun
dust211–130.0126%10 Jun
mirage10–130.0014%10 Jun
vertigo8–8-0.0729%6 Jun
mirage4–13-0.119%6 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0411%3 Jun
ancient15–150.0512%3 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0912%3 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0010%28 May
mirage13–110.0317%28 May
mirage15–150.0018%28 May
dust213–10.047%28 May
inferno5–13-0.0418%26 May
nuke13–80.0228%24 May
inferno8–13-0.0414%24 May
nuke6–130.1011%21 May
dust213–30.0120%21 May
dust213–80.0613%20 May
nuke13–40.0716%20 May
anubis13–90.0715%20 May
nuke15–150.0025%20 May
overpass11–13-0.009%16 May
overpass16–120.0511%12 May
ancient11–13-0.0321%10 May
dust213–6-0.0714%10 May
mirage13–20.0625%10 May
inferno13–110.0126%10 May
dust22–13-0.0714%10 May
mirage13–110.0114%10 May
inferno16–13-0.037%8 May
inferno13–8-0.0013%8 May
ancient13–10-0.0015%6 May
nuke8–13-0.0014%6 May
inferno13–10-0.0217%6 May
inferno11–130.0025%6 May
dust213–50.0825%6 May
nuke4–13-0.0520%6 May
anubis13–90.0424%3 May
ancient13–110.0218%1 May
inferno13–6-0.0423%1 May
overpass13–40.0711%1 May
nuke13–70.1024%1 May
cache11–130.1520%1 May
inferno9–13-0.0419%28 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0418%28 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0720%27 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0020%27 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0110%24 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0214%15 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0313%15 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0912%15 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0337%15 Apr
mirage4–130.0717%15 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →