Broman

Broman — CS2 Stats

76561198028987256[U:1:68721528]Steam profile ↗

1,012Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating9,592Light Blue band · top ~56.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9937 of 13472 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBromanPREMIER9,592 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning58
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression7.7
Utility5.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning5.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time619ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–3
131Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2091145%-0.01
dust2S2013765%-0.00
cacheB158753%-0.02
infernoS128467%0.02
nukeA116555%0.01
ancientC83538%-0.00
anubisB63350%-0.02
overpass31233%-0.01
vertigo32167%0.01
train21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
78.3ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis250%1.7015.0
Nuke1100%1.0912.0
Inferno10%0.6511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.5%Spray accuracy
69.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
614msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.89HE damage / grenade
6.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.9405% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0128%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0118%25 Aug
dust213–40.0738%25 Aug
dust213–4-0.0120%23 Aug
inferno13–30.1223%23 Aug
mirage7–4-0.0540%23 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0417%21 Aug
inferno5–130.0321%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0515%20 Aug
dust22–13-0.0217%20 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0721%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0915%16 Aug
dust213–60.0518%16 Aug
nuke13–70.0216%16 Aug
inferno14–160.0523%16 Aug
inferno13–90.0122%13 Aug
train13–70.0227%13 Aug
train5–130.0214%12 Aug
mirage13–60.0416%12 Aug
cache13–30.0525%12 Aug
dust20–13-0.0810%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0214%12 Aug
dust213–110.0520%12 Aug
anubis7–13-0.047%8 Aug
dust29–130.0124%8 Aug
cache13–7-0.0724%5 Aug
overpass4–13-0.0619%5 Aug
inferno13–60.0518%5 Aug
dust23–13-0.0424%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0322%4 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0317%4 Aug
mirage12–120.0422%3 Aug
vertigo13–90.0212%3 Aug
inferno13–10.0529%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0121%28 Jul
ancient13–80.0221%28 Jul
dust213–11-0.0115%28 Jul
nuke13–90.0425%28 Jul
ancient13–60.0421%28 Jul
cache13–80.0429%28 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0413%28 Jul
dust25–13-0.089%28 Jul
mirage12–4-0.0020%27 Jul
nuke16–120.0711%27 Jul
cache13–6-0.049%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.029%26 Jul
anubis13–80.0435%26 Jul
dust213–70.0321%26 Jul
inferno13–100.0918%26 Jul
cache13–5-0.029%24 Jul
ancient0–13-0.048%24 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0421%24 Jul
cache13–10-0.0525%24 Jul
anubis10–6-0.0119%24 Jul
ancient9–130.0431%24 Jul
nuke8–130.0021%23 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0328%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1125%20 Jul
dust213–50.0115%19 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0221%19 Jul
cache7–130.0033%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0616%16 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0026%16 Jul
dust24–00.0225%15 Jul
inferno13–110.0213%11 Jul
nuke4–130.0031%11 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0228%10 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0117%10 Jul
mirage13–60.1036%9 Jul
cache2–13-0.0321%9 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0221%9 Jul
nuke4–130.0415%8 Jul
cache9–13-0.1028%8 Jul
dust213–80.0611%8 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0020%8 Jul
cache13–50.0110%6 Jul
dust213–10-0.0120%6 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0322%4 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0316%30 Jun
nuke13–40.0429%30 Jun
overpass13–70.0517%30 Jun
mirage2–130.0122%30 Jun
dust213–9-0.0510%16 Jun
cache10–130.0011%14 Jun
dust213–6-0.0231%8 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0111%8 Jun
vertigo8–130.0221%6 Jun
dust213–9-0.0617%2 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0315%2 Jun
anubis6–00.017%29 May
cache13–100.0223%29 May
cache10–130.028%25 May
ancient13–9-0.0120%20 May
mirage13–7-0.0215%20 May
dust28–130.0315%20 May
cache6–130.0318%19 May
mirage13–11-0.0220%16 May
dust25–13-0.0233%16 May
cache0–2-0.090%16 May
nuke13–40.0024%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →