CyL3Nt — CS2 Stats

76561198021402527[U:1:61136799]Steam profile ↗

1,211Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidEntry Fragger

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,432 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning73

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–33–5Last 10062%Win rateTWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.3

Aggression10.0

Utility5.0

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels6.1

Clutch2.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning7.3

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels6.1

Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time526ms−80ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms

Headshot accuracy19.1%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 13–2

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 25ancientWeakest map · 55% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	25	18–7	72%	0.06
inferno	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
cache	A	16	9–7	56%	0.04
nuke	S	13	9–4	69%	0.05
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.05
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.07
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	0.05
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (55% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

380Matches

51%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

79.0ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	132	48%	1.19	15.6
Nuke	65	54%	1.28	16.2
Anubis	61	59%	1.20	16.8
Ancient	57	49%	1.10	13.9
Inferno	45	51%	1.16	15.6
Cache	9	78%	1.44	17.9
Overpass	5	0%	0.55	8.6
Vertigo	3	33%	0.91	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

44.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

84.4%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

530msReaction time

48.3%T opening success

60.7%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

5.54HE damage / grenade

7.67Flashes / match

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	12–12	0.07	29%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.11	9%	27 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	23%	27 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	11%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	28%	27 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	16%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.07	29%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	45%	26 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	27%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.01	18%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.16	25%	26 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.00	9%	26 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.03	9%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.11	29%	24 Aug →
inferno	5–8	0.10	13%	24 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.12	13%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	26%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.14	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.05	21%	24 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	23%	24 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.13	18%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.06	23%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	22%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.09	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.04	19%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	7%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.08	23%	19 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.09	26%	17 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.08	0%	17 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	12%	17 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	9%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.10	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	14%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.06	14%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	23%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.18	20%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	19%	11 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.00	26%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.14	18%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.07	16%	10 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	12%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.03	20%	6 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	20%	5 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.09	18%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	18%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.00	20%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.04	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.05	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	14%	3 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.08	24%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	19%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	12%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	23%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.07	24%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.15	30%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.09	26%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	10%	28 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	22%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.20	24%	28 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	32%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	21%	27 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.07	15%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.09	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.09	20%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	13%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	8%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.10	13%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.09	17%	23 Jul →
cache	8–9	-0.01	17%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.06	15%	16 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	25%	16 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	10%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	20%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.07	16%	15 Jul →
overpass	13–3	-0.01	17%	15 Jul →
train	13–8	0.09	10%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	18%	15 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.06	17%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.06	15%	14 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	21%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.08	23%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	10%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	24%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.13	24%	14 Jul →
cache	3–9	0.08	25%	13 Jul →
train	10–13	-0.03	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.12	14%	13 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.04	29%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.13	24%	13 Jul →
inferno	1–5	-0.03	43%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.11	19%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–0	-0.04	15%	8 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	16%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.13	16%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.16	7%	8 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	23%	8 Jul →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price