Sm1th — CS2 Stats

76561198019733975[U:1:59468247]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,556Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,744 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning63

Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–45Last 10055%Win rateWWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0

Aggression7.4

Utility7.9

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; higher utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning6.3

Utility7.9

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time587ms+3ms

first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy22.7%+3.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–1Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 77% over 22cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	23	14–9	61%	0.02
anubis	S	22	17–5	77%	0.03
mirage	C	19	7–12	37%	0.01
inferno	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,368Matches

49%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

71.9ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	614	50%	1.08	14.5
Dust2	518	50%	1.14	14.6
Anubis	424	49%	1.07	14.8
Ancient	407	47%	1.05	14.6
Inferno	247	50%	1.11	15.1
Nuke	177	52%	1.09	15.0
Overpass	56	41%	1.03	14.9
Train	55	51%	0.92	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

80.4%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

587msReaction time

20.8%T opening success

62.8%CT opening success

0.68Enemies flashed / flash

12.9%Flash assists

13.17HE damage / grenade

21.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.8213% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	0.07	30%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	24%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.04	24%	30 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	32%	30 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	29%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	32%	29 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	20%	29 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.00	20%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	29%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.07	22%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	25%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	21%	28 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	19%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	24%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	28%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	15%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	23%	27 Aug →
inferno	22–20	0.05	32%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.01	15%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	26%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.04	21%	26 Aug →
inferno	19–16	0.01	30%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.02	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.00	14%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	31%	25 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.03	18%	24 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	24%	24 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	19%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	20%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.13	22%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	31%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.07	32%	23 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	26%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.15	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.02	21%	23 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	8%	22 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	28%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	17%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	20%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.00	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	18%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	20%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.11	24%	19 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.05	24%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	11%	19 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.03	21%	19 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	38%	19 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	11%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	13%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	30%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	13%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.07	17%	17 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	13%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.05	38%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	24%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.15	31%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	27%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.00	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	30%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.08	20%	16 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	25%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.19	20%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	8%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.12	29%	15 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.06	23%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	19%	14 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.03	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	19–16	0.02	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	20%	14 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	18%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	15%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.07	25%	13 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	24%	13 Aug →
anubis	15–19	0.04	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	10%	13 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	21%	13 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	24%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	8%	13 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.01	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	13%	13 Aug →