ThomastheDankEngine — CS2 Stats

76561198015779302[U:1:55513574]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

687Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPassive Rifler

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning41

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression4.2

Utility5.9

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning4.1

Utility5.9

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time665ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 665ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−5.8%

first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 6–9

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	30	17–13	57%	0.01
inferno	C	24	10–14	42%	0.02
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	0.00
anubis	S	9	6–3	67%	0.00
overpass	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.06
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches

50%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

75.5ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	7	71%	1.16	15.9
Anubis	6	50%	1.01	15.3
Dust2	4	25%	0.67	10.8
Inferno	4	50%	1.22	17.3
Nuke	1	100%	0.75	9.0
Ancient	1	0%	0.76	19.0
Vertigo	1	100%	0.93	13.0
Train	1	0%	0.70	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.7%Spray accuracy

86.3%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

666msReaction time

22.3%T opening success

47.0%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

11.7%Flash assists

8.28HE damage / grenade

7.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.311% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	6–13	0.02	16%	29 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.06	40%	23 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.06	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	22%	23 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.07	8%	2 May →
cache	0–7	-0.09	22%	2 May →
cache	13–5	-0.03	22%	2 May →
nuke	13–8	0.10	33%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	7%	25 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	18%	25 Apr →
anubis	13–10	0.06	23%	25 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	11%	25 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	37%	24 Apr →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	16%	24 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	36%	24 Apr →
inferno	5–13	0.03	25%	24 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.02	19%	23 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.04	24%	23 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.02	33%	23 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	17%	23 Apr →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	21%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	25%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	14%	22 Apr →
overpass	13–11	-0.07	21%	22 Apr →
anubis	13–3	0.04	21%	22 Apr →
mirage	16–14	-0.08	19%	17 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	17%	17 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	13%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.00	18%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.01	9%	17 Apr →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	20%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.02	25%	15 Apr →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	15%	15 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	20%	15 Apr →
overpass	13–4	0.02	14%	14 Apr →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	17%	14 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.02	26%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.05	29%	14 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.04	21%	14 Apr →
overpass	13–1	0.05	15%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.01	17%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	19%	13 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.07	23%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	24%	12 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.05	50%	12 Apr →
inferno	16–14	-0.04	22%	12 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.05	20%	11 Apr →
dust2	3–13	0.01	13%	11 Apr →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	13%	10 Apr →
mirage	12–16	0.00	26%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.01	9%	9 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.08	28%	8 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	16%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.09	31%	8 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.06	15%	4 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	22%	4 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	17%	4 Apr →
anubis	6–13	0.00	16%	4 Apr →
inferno	8–13	0.00	17%	4 Apr →
inferno	9–13	0.00	0%	3 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.01	36%	3 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	15%	2 Apr →
overpass	13–7	0.08	29%	2 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.00	11%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.03	27%	2 Apr →
nuke	2–13	0.00	0%	2 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	13%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	13%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.04	27%	30 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.02	26%	30 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.09	29%	26 Mar →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	20%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.08	27%	26 Mar →
nuke	12–12	0.00	13%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	20%	25 Mar →
inferno	9–13	0.00	17%	25 Mar →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	30%	25 Mar →
overpass	4–13	0.01	35%	25 Mar →
office	13–10	0.02	32%	24 Mar →
mirage	7–13	0.10	24%	24 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	21%	23 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	25%	23 Mar →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	22%	23 Mar →
inferno	7–13	0.02	24%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	30%	23 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.02	31%	22 Mar →
ancient	15–15	0.00	28%	22 Mar →
inferno	6–9	0.08	55%	21 Mar →
inferno	6–9	0.14	32%	21 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.01	19%	19 Mar →
mirage	13–0	0.11	28%	19 Mar →
inferno	13–10	0.06	43%	19 Mar →
nuke	12–12	0.09	20%	17 Mar →
overpass	4–13	0.01	31%	17 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	34%	17 Mar →
overpass	13–8	-0.01	26%	17 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.08	30%	17 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	23%	16 Mar →
inferno	11–13	0.05	20%	16 Mar →
anubis	16–13	-0.05	15%	14 Mar →