HumanEdshotMachine — CS2 Stats

SE76561198010935649[U:1:50669921]Steam profile ↗

823Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,339Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10621 of 52365 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,149 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning64

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression8.6

Utility7.0

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning6.4

Utility7.0

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time512ms−89ms

first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms

Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–9

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 78% over 9cacheWeakest map · 35% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	23	8–15	35%	0.04
anubis	B	19	9–10	47%	0.05
ancient	B	19	9–10	47%	0.04
nuke	S	12	9–3	75%	0.06
mirage	A	10	6–4	60%	0.03
dust2	S	9	7–2	78%	0.08
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

781Matches

54%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

83.5ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	26	65%	1.13	15.7
Ancient	18	50%	1.04	17.1
Dust2	16	44%	1.08	17.1
Inferno	8	50%	0.82	11.3
Nuke	7	71%	1.28	21.7
Anubis	6	33%	1.04	15.2
Train	4	75%	0.90	12.3
Cache	4	50%	1.67	20.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.8%Spray accuracy

80.9%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

516msReaction time

32.7%T opening success

56.4%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

8.63HE damage / grenade

7.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.6777% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	10–13	0.02	15%	30 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	8%	30 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.03	17%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.12	16%	28 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.02	23%	28 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.04	26%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.14	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.03	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.12	14%	26 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	20%	26 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.03	18%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.15	18%	25 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	27%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	18%	24 Aug →
anubis	7–3	0.06	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.09	33%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.11	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.15	25%	24 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	18%	22 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.05	28%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.00	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	4%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	23%	19 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.13	21%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	16%	18 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	19%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.13	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	11%	16 Aug →
cache	1–6	0.04	16%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	29%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.10	27%	11 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	16%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.03	9%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	15%	10 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.06	16%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	17%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	17%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.08	33%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	21%	8 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.04	35%	8 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	20%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	21%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.15	16%	8 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.00	30%	8 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.01	24%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.00	22%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	20%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	40%	7 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	15%	7 Aug →
nuke	2–13	0.03	8%	7 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.13	20%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	21%	4 Aug →
boulder	7–13	-0.03	21%	3 Aug →
fachwerk	7–13	0.04	23%	3 Aug →
shelter	10–6	-0.00	23%	3 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.05	17%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	16%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	20%	3 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.09	19%	2 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.07	20%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.15	18%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	13%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	13%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.17	25%	2 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.06	16%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.00	24%	2 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.01	26%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	29%	31 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	22%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	24%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	17%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.01	18%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	21%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.05	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.20	18%	22 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	25%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.09	10%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.10	13%	21 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.10	20%	21 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.06	20%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	13%	18 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.09	12%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.14	9%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.11	12%	18 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.08	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.09	17%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	7%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.07	14%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.04	21%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.12	12%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	15%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.01	15%	10 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	21%	10 Jul →