rehZERAH

rehZERAH — CS2 Stats

BR76561198001147275[U:1:40881547]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

560Tracked matches27%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,239 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrehZERAHFACEITLevel 5 · 1,239 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning44
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD3961Last 10039%Win rateLWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression3.3
Utility6.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.4
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time649ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — anubis 16–12
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
815In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2581732%-0.00
mirageC24101442%-0.01
dust2C1981142%-0.00
ancientD1751229%-0.02
anubisS54180%0.03
cache43175%-0.03
overpass31233%0.04
nuke2020%-0.01
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

304Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
73.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7344%1.0714.1
Anubis5852%1.0415.1
Ancient4848%1.0914.0
Inferno3847%0.9412.8
Dust23253%0.9013.5
Vertigo2969%1.2815.5
Nuke1833%0.8511.4
Overpass475%1.2214.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
646msReaction time
18.3%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
10.56HE damage / grenade
13.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.2901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0312%27 Aug
inferno13–10.0018%27 Aug
mirage9–130.0136%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0216%19 Aug
mirage9–13-0.020%16 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0211%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0627%16 Aug
ancient8–130.0023%16 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0130%13 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0111%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0422%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0710%8 Aug
ancient11–130.0115%2 Aug
dust214–160.0326%2 Aug
mirage13–20.02100%31 Jul
dust28–130.0228%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0514%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0413%29 Jul
mirage4–130.049%29 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0225%28 Jul
mirage9–130.0027%27 Jul
dust23–13-0.0764%27 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0521%25 Jul
dust213–70.0513%25 Jul
cache13–8-0.0630%23 Jul
anubis2–130.0146%23 Jul
ancient7–130.0017%22 Jul
cache4–13-0.0623%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0619%19 Jul
mirage13–30.0830%19 Jul
overpass13–30.0410%13 Jul
cache13–40.0540%13 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0338%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0624%11 Jul
dust213–110.0516%11 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0329%11 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0615%11 Jul
inferno13–30.0522%10 Jul
inferno13–100.0318%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0023%4 Jul
dust211–130.0712%3 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0212%2 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0315%30 Jun
dust211–13-0.0034%28 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0430%28 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0223%28 Jun
dust24–13-0.046%28 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0122%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0029%27 Jun
ancient13–11-0.019%27 Jun
inferno7–13-0.049%21 Jun
dust213–60.0618%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0418%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0724%20 Jun
inferno13–60.0813%17 Jun
overpass6–130.0323%16 Jun
ancient6–130.0110%16 Jun
anubis13–50.0620%13 Jun
ancient13–100.0221%13 Jun
dust213–30.0328%10 Jun
mirage20–220.0131%7 Jun
cache13–6-0.0631%7 Jun
inferno13–80.0421%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0221%4 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0910%4 Jun
anubis13–100.0026%4 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0932%4 Jun
dust213–10-0.0120%4 Jun
inferno13–40.0224%4 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0513%31 May
mirage13–8-0.009%27 May
ancient13–90.0235%23 May
dust213–110.0117%23 May
dust213–5-0.0017%22 May
dust29–130.0338%19 May
inferno6–130.0128%17 May
anubis19–170.0025%17 May
dust213–8-0.0814%17 May
inferno10–130.0113%12 May
inferno16–19-0.0423%10 May
ancient13–160.0015%10 May
mirage9–13-0.1217%10 May
mirage5–13-0.0117%10 May
mirage8–13-0.0511%9 May
inferno10–13-0.025%5 May
ancient11–13-0.0025%1 May
inferno19–22-0.0120%1 May
mirage11–13-0.0335%1 May
inferno5–130.0544%30 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0336%26 Apr
inferno11–130.0029%26 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0312%25 Apr
anubis16–120.0933%21 Apr
inferno16–190.0227%18 Apr
vertigo11–130.0221%18 Apr
inferno7–130.0235%10 Apr
nuke9–130.029%8 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0226%8 Apr
overpass7–130.0422%3 Apr
mirage13–70.0536%3 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →