♗Archbishop Bartholomew Blowsock

♗Archbishop Bartholomew Blowsock — CS2 Stats

CA76561197999710008[U:1:39444280]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,163Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating12,615Blue band · top ~41% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15738 of 22710 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,202 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♗Archbishop Bartholomew B…FACEITLevel 6 · 1,202 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER12,615 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning51
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46495Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression7.5
Utility6.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 674ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time666ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 698ms → last ⅓ avg 666ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–2
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28131546%-0.00
infernoB20101050%0.02
nukeB1991047%-0.03
anubisA116555%-0.01
mirageB105550%0.01
ancientC83538%-0.00
train2020%-0.00
office1010%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

191Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5652%1.1616.2
Nuke3358%1.1916.5
Anubis2857%1.0815.0
Dust22576%1.0716.6
Vertigo2326%0.9315.9
Ancient1533%1.1715.0
Mirage1040%1.0016.9
Overpass10%0.8917.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
674msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
5.96HE damage / grenade
12.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5553% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train7–13-0.0229%21 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0138%16 May
ancient7–130.0128%13 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0622%13 Apr
mirage6–130.0228%13 Apr
nuke13–7-0.029%13 Apr
inferno7–130.0117%13 Apr
dust213–30.108%13 Apr
dust22–13-0.0929%31 Mar
inferno13–50.0311%30 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0115%30 Mar
anubis16–12-0.0521%23 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0913%12 Mar
nuke13–3-0.0616%11 Mar
dust213–100.0325%10 Mar
inferno10–130.0521%23 Feb
dust213–9-0.0118%6 Feb
inferno13–70.089%6 Feb
dust213–160.0217%6 Feb
inferno11–130.018%6 Feb
inferno13–90.1019%6 Feb
nuke13–80.0613%5 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0813%3 Feb
dust211–13-0.0115%3 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0015%2 Feb
nuke7–40.0317%2 Feb
anubis9–13-0.036%2 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0711%2 Feb
nuke13–100.0111%30 Jan
ancient8–130.0413%30 Jan
dust213–110.0011%30 Jan
anubis11–13-0.044%30 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0120%30 Jan
dust29–13-0.0116%30 Jan
dust213–70.0318%29 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0531%29 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0510%29 Jan
dust213–160.0214%27 Jan
dust213–70.0116%27 Jan
nuke9–13-0.049%27 Jan
inferno13–100.0110%27 Jan
inferno13–80.0311%27 Jan
dust211–13-0.0017%27 Jan
inferno3–13-0.034%27 Jan
anubis10–13-0.058%27 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0223%27 Jan
dust213–10-0.0314%27 Jan
anubis16–120.0413%26 Jan
mirage13–40.0311%26 Jan
nuke8–130.006%26 Jan
inferno12–160.0010%26 Jan
dust213–70.005%26 Jan
dust28–130.0420%26 Jan
dust210–13-0.0516%26 Jan
nuke16–13-0.028%26 Jan
dust210–13-0.0429%26 Jan
mirage4–13-0.106%26 Jan
dust210–130.0228%26 Jan
inferno13–00.0619%25 Jan
ancient12–160.0519%25 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0218%25 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0414%25 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0518%25 Jan
dust213–20.1319%25 Jan
nuke7–130.0122%25 Jan
nuke4–13-0.1116%25 Jan
inferno13–110.0318%25 Jan
dust27–13-0.1023%25 Jan
dust27–13-0.0316%25 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0317%24 Jan
anubis13–20.0428%24 Jan
anubis13–110.028%22 Jan
mirage13–110.0310%22 Jan
anubis13–100.014%21 Jan
inferno6–13-0.029%21 Jan
anubis13–90.0314%20 Jan
inferno10–130.0517%20 Jan
office2–13-0.0323%20 Jan
dust28–13-0.1112%19 Jan
dust213–5-0.0313%19 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0413%19 Jan
dust213–100.0114%19 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0619%19 Jan
mirage13–80.0111%19 Jan
inferno13–60.0822%19 Jan
ancient13–100.0316%16 Jan
mirage13–90.0820%16 Jan
train15–150.0217%16 Jan
mirage15–150.0620%16 Jan
nuke11–13-0.0818%16 Jan
dust216–140.0113%15 Jan
nuke13–6-0.099%15 Jan
mirage8–130.0620%15 Jan
inferno13–60.0016%15 Jan
dust27–130.0126%15 Jan
inferno13–60.0316%15 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0316%15 Jan
dust29–130.0118%15 Jan
dust213–20.0216%15 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0412%14 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →