shoez!

shoez! — CS2 Stats

76561197989338599[U:1:29072871]Steam profile ↗

1,390Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,816Blue band · top ~34.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12081 of 17922 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshoez!FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,816 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning35
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44551Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.1
Aggression5.0
Utility7.3
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.5
Utility7.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time606ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — cache 13–4
132Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 16ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30121840%-0.04
cacheA169756%0.00
dust2C146843%-0.02
ancientD124833%-0.03
infernoD124833%-0.02
anubisB115645%-0.02
overpass32167%-0.02
nuke220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

326Matches
49%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
73.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage944%1.1312.4
Inferno560%0.7514.2
Ancient425%0.8715.8
Anubis333%0.7913.7
Dust2367%0.8613.7
Nuke20%0.446.5
Overpass250%0.609.0
Cache1100%1.3818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
608msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
10.99HE damage / grenade
10.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.4985% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0728%27 Aug
dust213–16-0.0233%27 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0623%24 Aug
cache10–13-0.0833%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0521%23 Aug
dust210–130.0231%23 Aug
mirage13–80.0326%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0513%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0526%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0620%20 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0616%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0415%19 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0712%19 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0411%19 Jul
mirage13–70.0414%19 Jul
dust216–130.0117%19 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0329%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0221%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0710%19 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0417%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0424%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0320%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0516%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0322%19 Jul
mirage13–100.0518%19 Jul
cache10–130.0422%19 Jul
dust23–13-0.0317%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0715%18 Jul
anubis13–40.0722%18 Jul
nuke13–90.0234%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.0816%18 Jul
cache13–20.0310%18 Jul
cache13–8-0.0221%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0815%18 Jul
cache13–70.0025%18 Jul
inferno11–130.0623%18 Jul
mirage13–7-0.009%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0610%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.0329%15 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0226%15 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0320%15 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0522%14 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0111%14 Jul
dust213–90.0111%14 Jul
cache10–130.0615%13 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0519%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0624%12 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0618%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0514%12 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0921%12 Jul
inferno10–130.0210%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0321%12 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0514%12 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0713%12 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0224%12 Jul
mirage1–13-0.098%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0428%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0416%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0613%12 Jul
anubis8–13-0.079%12 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0216%12 Jul
cache13–6-0.0519%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0417%11 Jul
cache13–40.0820%11 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0314%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.066%11 Jul
dust213–100.0116%11 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0815%11 Jul
dust213–3-0.0222%11 Jul
anubis15–150.0721%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0719%10 Jul
dust213–8-0.0121%10 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0420%10 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0414%10 Jul
cache3–130.0418%10 Jul
cache13–110.0312%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0623%9 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0030%9 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0817%9 Jul
overpass13–30.0617%8 Jul
cache13–60.0214%8 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0227%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0117%6 Jul
ancient13–70.0024%6 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0714%5 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0422%5 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0511%5 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0419%5 Jul
ancient6–130.0325%5 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0619%5 Jul
dust213–70.0718%5 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0135%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0214%5 Jul
overpass13–5-0.0611%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0728%4 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0415%4 Jul
inferno10–30.0434%4 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0519%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0116%4 Jul
anubis13–80.0225%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →