Lint Licker

Lint Licker — CS2 Stats

US76561197981601797[U:1:21336069]Steam profile ↗

401Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,878Blue band · top ~44.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16406 of 23205 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLint LickerFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,878 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.6
Utility5.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time591ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy10.2%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.9% → last ⅓ avg 10.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 88% over 8ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27131448%-0.00
mirageC2391439%0.01
nukeA1710759%-0.01
ancientD113827%-0.02
cacheS87188%0.02
infernoA85363%0.00
anubisS64267%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
61%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
67.7ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage875%0.9912.3
Inferno667%0.7314.7
Cache475%0.8212.8
Dust2333%0.628.7
Anubis333%0.9815.0
Ancient250%0.7611.0
Nuke10%0.6716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
593msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
11.16HE damage / grenade
5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.2501% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6064% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.034%28 Aug
cache13–11-0.016%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.079%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0410%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.096%28 Aug
cache13–11-0.0415%28 Aug
mirage5–130.0118%28 Aug
inferno13–40.038%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0812%27 Aug
nuke13–90.028%27 Aug
mirage16–140.029%27 Aug
ancient7–130.040%27 Aug
anubis5–13-0.036%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0321%27 Aug
mirage13–70.0411%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.027%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.079%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.038%26 Aug
nuke13–80.0117%26 Aug
nuke13–100.0011%26 Aug
inferno13–8-0.039%26 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0015%26 Aug
dust213–11-0.027%26 Aug
mirage6–130.034%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0314%25 Aug
cache13–6-0.0221%25 Aug
cache13–20.0914%25 Aug
nuke3–13-0.058%25 Aug
nuke13–70.003%25 Aug
dust215–150.0514%25 Aug
dust210–130.0216%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.077%24 Aug
ancient13–80.008%24 Aug
dust213–60.0511%24 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0315%24 Aug
cache13–30.0612%24 Aug
nuke9–13-0.113%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.023%24 Aug
dust210–130.0722%21 Aug
inferno2–13-0.057%21 Aug
dust213–90.0328%21 Aug
dust216–140.0214%21 Aug
mirage1–13-0.080%20 Aug
dust215–150.007%20 Aug
ancient13–90.077%20 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0212%20 Aug
cache8–10.0515%20 Aug
dust215–15-0.0711%20 Aug
mirage8–130.0420%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0117%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0112%19 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0118%19 Aug
inferno13–3-0.014%14 Aug
dust213–30.0711%14 Aug
dust215–15-0.0618%14 Aug
cache15–150.0414%14 Aug
dust213–4-0.0513%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0210%13 Aug
dust213–80.139%13 Aug
dust213–110.149%13 Aug
ancient8–13-0.068%13 Aug
cache13–7-0.0319%13 Aug
anubis13–40.0514%12 Aug
mirage13–50.139%12 Aug
mirage10–13-0.018%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0314%12 Aug
mirage6–130.0710%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0310%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0419%11 Aug
mirage9–130.0118%10 Aug
mirage13–110.0116%10 Aug
anubis3–13-0.063%10 Aug
inferno13–100.0720%10 Aug
nuke13–7-0.016%10 Aug
mirage13–110.087%10 Aug
dust213–10-0.0216%10 Aug
dust213–110.037%8 Aug
nuke13–4-0.058%8 Aug
ancient1–13-0.029%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.016%7 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0311%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0113%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.075%6 Aug
nuke13–160.015%6 Aug
dust23–13-0.049%6 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0011%5 Aug
anubis13–40.079%5 Aug
nuke13–80.0610%5 Aug
mirage13–10.186%5 Aug
dust213–6-0.0112%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0111%5 Aug
dust213–7-0.046%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.053%5 Aug
dust213–90.026%4 Aug
nuke13–60.0711%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0119%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0012%4 Aug
inferno17–190.027%30 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0411%30 Jul
ancient5–13-0.105%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →