KaHu — CS2 Stats

76561197977692584[U:1:17426856]

2,432Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPassive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#4724 of 5314 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,468 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,468Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,468
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKaHuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,468 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,468csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning44
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57412Last 10057%Win rateWWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression3.4
Utility5.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time546ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2213959%0.01
infernoA2113862%0.01
mirageA2012860%-0.01
overpassA127558%-0.00
nukeA117464%0.01
ancientC83538%-0.00
cache21150%0.04
train21150%0.05
anubis1010%-0.09
jura1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,917Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
76.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41448%1.0115.7
Dust232754%1.0616.1
Inferno29658%1.1115.7
Ancient18048%1.0015.0
Anubis12048%0.9915.0
Nuke11450%1.0216.9
Overpass8855%1.0716.3
Cache2245%1.0615.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.4%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
550msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
11.38HE damage / grenade
5.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9373% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0122%24 Aug
inferno13–00.1543%18 Aug
cache13–80.1118%18 Aug
dust211–130.0720%17 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0118%3 Aug
nuke13–40.0527%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0224%5 Jul
dust213–90.0617%5 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0116%5 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0925%5 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0028%1 Jul
dust210–13-0.0730%1 Jul
cache16–19-0.0315%6 Jun
inferno13–10.0427%4 Jun
inferno13–90.0233%27 May
mirage4–130.0220%26 May
inferno13–2-0.0117%17 May
nuke12–16-0.0314%11 May
overpass13–11-0.0521%2 May
inferno9–130.0130%24 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0217%23 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0217%22 Apr
dust213–50.1228%21 Apr
dust210–13-0.0330%20 Apr
mirage13–110.0220%17 Apr
nuke13–60.0222%13 Apr
mirage8–130.0027%12 Apr
ancient10–130.0317%12 Apr
mirage13–60.0432%7 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0417%6 Apr
dust213–70.0617%6 Apr
overpass13–20.0831%6 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0217%6 Apr
dust213–6-0.0219%6 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0321%6 Apr
nuke19–17-0.0234%6 Apr
dust213–70.1030%5 Apr
inferno19–150.0530%30 Mar
inferno13–60.0127%29 Mar
inferno16–140.0229%29 Mar
nuke13–70.0633%27 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0126%23 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0621%1 Mar
nuke13–70.0721%30 Jan
dust213–70.0426%30 Jan
nuke10–130.0418%27 Jan
dust213–11-0.0521%18 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0117%18 Jan
mirage13–50.0424%14 Jan
ancient3–00.0814%14 Jan
overpass10–130.0235%12 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0517%8 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0610%2 Jan
dust217–190.0120%1 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0022%8 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0510%5 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0116%29 Nov
dust213–40.0214%21 Nov
dust213–70.0820%21 Nov
overpass13–10-0.0511%20 Nov
dust215–15-0.0221%14 Nov
mirage13–80.0533%10 Nov
dust25–13-0.0521%7 Nov
train13–90.0325%7 Nov
train10–130.0623%7 Nov
dust24–13-0.0616%23 Oct
dust213–90.0622%23 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0510%19 Oct
overpass7–130.0322%13 Oct
inferno13–70.0038%12 Oct
ancient9–130.0110%11 Oct
ancient9–130.0117%7 Oct
dust213–6-0.0419%7 Oct
overpass13–11-0.0016%4 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0223%27 Sept
overpass13–50.0531%27 Sept
ancient13–11-0.089%26 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0811%17 Sept
inferno13–70.0213%15 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0220%1 Sept
mirage9–13-0.1222%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0232%27 Aug
inferno17–190.0239%27 Aug
overpass6–13-0.028%26 Aug
dust213–5-0.0424%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0836%18 Aug
overpass7–13-0.0517%18 Aug
dust28–13-0.0233%10 Aug
mirage12–120.0825%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0122%28 Jul
inferno25–22-0.0127%22 Jul
overpass13–40.0219%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0814%15 Jul
inferno7–130.0132%30 Jun
dust213–110.0224%16 Jun
inferno13–70.0312%15 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0219%10 Jun
jura1–13-0.0026%7 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0219%11 May
nuke13–60.0217%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →