4ND9R — CS2 Stats

76561197974865161[U:1:14599433]

3,411Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG4ND9RFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning46
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44515Last 10044%Win rateWLWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.6
Aggression3.7
Utility7.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.6
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — boulder 5–13
133Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 24% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD2151624%0.01
dust2B137654%0.01
nukeA127558%-0.00
infernoA127558%0.00
mirageD113827%-0.00
anubisB105550%0.00
cacheA85363%-0.01
boulderD62433%0.02
debris21150%-0.03
overpass21150%0.04
poseidon1010%0.09
shelter110100%0.11
fachwerk1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,114Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
74.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient29953%1.1116.1
Anubis23548%1.0514.9
Mirage18046%0.9314.7
Dust218049%1.0415.1
Inferno14458%1.1215.5
Vertigo7942%0.9914.6
Nuke6645%1.0815.7
Overpass4747%0.9516.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
563msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
15.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.4904% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0517%26 Aug
ancient9–130.0014%26 Aug
dust216–130.0017%25 Aug
anubis10–130.0127%25 Aug
dust27–130.0125%24 Aug
dust213–80.0521%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0321%24 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0116%24 Aug
mirage19–150.0315%23 Aug
anubis13–40.0119%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0516%19 Aug
ancient3–130.0033%19 Aug
cache13–4-0.0023%19 Aug
boulder13–40.0539%16 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0022%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0517%14 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0119%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.017%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0420%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0542%14 Aug
cache9–130.0627%13 Aug
ancient13–110.0915%8 Aug
ancient10–130.0422%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0117%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.0323%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0313%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0314%4 Aug
cache10–13-0.0216%4 Aug
inferno13–60.1124%4 Aug
anubis19–16-0.0115%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0614%2 Aug
ancient8–13-0.046%2 Aug
ancient8–130.0213%31 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0027%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0017%30 Jul
poseidon8–80.0928%29 Jul
cache13–9-0.0423%29 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0426%27 Jul
inferno16–140.0115%27 Jul
ancient9–130.0416%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0117%24 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0120%23 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0311%22 Jul
dust213–110.0719%22 Jul
inferno10–130.0412%22 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0413%22 Jul
ancient13–90.0215%21 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0322%20 Jul
ancient1–13-0.088%20 Jul
dust213–70.0623%19 Jul
anubis13–60.0314%17 Jul
debris8–8-0.1333%16 Jul
debris9–20.0747%16 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0320%16 Jul
mirage29–31-0.0118%15 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0331%13 Jul
nuke5–13-0.106%12 Jul
boulder5–130.1216%11 Jul
shelter13–90.1141%11 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0121%11 Jul
boulder13–10-0.0424%10 Jul
fachwerk2–13-0.0227%10 Jul
boulder12–120.0630%10 Jul
anubis13–16-0.018%6 Jul
inferno13–110.0314%6 Jul
dust213–60.0330%6 Jul
overpass13–80.0416%6 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0116%6 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0127%5 Jul
dust210–13-0.0221%5 Jul
ancient9–130.0420%5 Jul
anubis13–90.0832%5 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0925%4 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0324%4 Jul
dust213–11-0.0318%4 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0317%4 Jul
dust213–50.0426%4 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0629%4 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0020%4 Jul
nuke13–40.0724%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0015%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0221%3 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0013%3 Jul
overpass9–130.0420%3 Jul
nuke13–70.0918%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.039%2 Jul
nuke13–70.0731%2 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0122%2 Jul
ancient13–30.0322%2 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1139%1 Jul
cache13–8-0.0319%1 Jul
cache6–13-0.0412%28 Jun
cache13–5-0.0426%28 Jun
cache13–5-0.0014%28 Jun
ancient16–140.0526%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0416%28 Jun
ancient8–130.0327%28 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0214%28 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0324%28 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0019%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →