Shocky* — CS2 Stats

DE76561197971318584[U:1:11052856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,338Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,948Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3300 of 11796 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,184 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,948Peak Premier on CSDB

2,184Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,184
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 316 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 22,948
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,052 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning65

Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression8.4

Utility7.7

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning6.5

Utility7.7

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time547ms−49ms

first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 5–0

13–0Biggest win — ancient

10Longest win streak

L9Current streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	28	13–15	46%	0.01
dust2	B	25	12–13	48%	-0.00
inferno	C	18	8–10	44%	0.01
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
anubis	S	10	7–3	70%	0.02
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.08
mirage	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,799Matches

50%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

78.8ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	401	56%	1.09	15.6
Inferno	227	47%	0.97	14.6
Anubis	226	45%	0.97	14.8
Dust2	172	40%	0.97	15.0
Nuke	74	51%	1.12	15.7
Overpass	71	49%	0.94	14.8
Mirage	41	41%	0.84	12.3
Train	16	50%	1.31	16.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy

30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.0%Spray accuracy

76.1%Counter-strafing

9.4°Preaim

547msReaction time

41.5%T opening success

52.2%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

12.7%Flash assists

11.06HE damage / grenade

13.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.05	21%	25 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	22%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	16%	21 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	11%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	22%	19 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	13%	19 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.05	20%	17 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	38%	17 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.02	13%	13 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.07	14%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.11	22%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.12	19%	10 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	13%	10 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	11%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	19%	10 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	13%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	24%	9 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.05	20%	9 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.09	33%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	22%	7 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	30%	7 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	17%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	17%	5 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	0%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	22%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	23%	4 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.10	27%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	29%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	46%	3 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	26%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–0	0.21	0%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	26%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	20%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.00	32%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–2	-0.01	47%	30 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	30%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	21%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	26%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.07	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	30%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.06	10%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.06	27%	28 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	30%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.00	23%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	13%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	22%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.04	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.04	24%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	19%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	14%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	21%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.06	38%	21 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	30%	21 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.04	23%	21 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	20%	21 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	29%	20 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	24%	20 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	31%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	28%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	21%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	36%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	12%	18 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.06	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.07	34%	17 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	13%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.19	46%	17 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.02	29%	17 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.01	29%	16 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.09	25%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	17%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	17%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.08	13%	16 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	21%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	20%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	37%	15 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	14%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.00	17%	15 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.05	36%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.10	28%	14 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.03	27%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.00	10%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	24%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	16%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	47%	13 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	25%	13 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.08	30%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	15%	12 Jul →