Feberdrømmen — CS2 Stats

76561197970723615[U:1:10457887]

2,164Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating17,143Purple band · top ~19.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19005 of 35274 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning42

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–55–6Last 10039%Win rateLLWLLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression4.1

Utility5.9

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning4.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time599ms−39ms

first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy19.1%+2.7%

first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–1

13–1Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 13overpassWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	D	33	11–22	33%	-0.00
dust2	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
mirage	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.00
ancient	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.02
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.01
overpass	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.03
vertigo	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.01
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.05
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.04
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10
stronghold	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

479Matches

48%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

70.2ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	12	50%	0.95	14.2
Anubis	11	45%	0.83	11.0
Ancient	9	78%	0.76	11.8
Nuke	5	60%	0.92	15.0
Dust2	5	20%	0.93	16.2
Train	3	33%	0.84	13.0
Vertigo	2	50%	0.98	17.0
Cache	2	100%	1.09	11.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.8%Spray accuracy

77.1%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

610msReaction time

25.6%T opening success

28.8%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

1.9%Flash assists

10.00HE damage / grenade

8.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.6318% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	2–13	-0.05	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	22%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	13%	24 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	19%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	18%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	20%	17 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	8%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.07	6%	8 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	15%	8 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.01	24%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.05	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	29%	6 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.03	23%	4 Aug →
fachwerk	13–7	0.10	33%	4 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.05	14%	4 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.08	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	17%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.04	12%	3 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	17%	3 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.04	13%	10 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	16%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	7%	10 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.02	24%	10 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	29%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	24%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	6%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.03	14%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	-0.05	17%	8 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.02	17%	8 Jul →
cache	1–8	-0.00	36%	8 Jul →
cache	2–0	0.12	50%	8 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	14%	8 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	12%	6 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	16%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	37%	6 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.06	7%	6 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.07	14%	5 Jul →
overpass	9–13	-0.00	10%	5 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.03	12%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.08	22%	3 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.09	16%	30 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	5%	30 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.06	26%	30 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.04	21%	30 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	17%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	24%	24 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	10%	24 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	0.02	12%	24 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.00	11%	24 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.02	11%	22 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.00	12%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.00	18%	22 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	13%	22 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.04	13%	19 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	18%	14 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.03	22%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	10%	14 Jun →
cache	13–1	0.15	19%	13 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	22%	13 Jun →
cache	13–5	-0.02	14%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	13%	9 Jun →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	21%	9 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	15%	9 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.04	18%	9 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	5%	8 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.01	11%	8 Jun →
overpass	12–12	-0.09	13%	8 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.00	25%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	21%	1 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.02	18%	1 Jun →
ancient	1–13	-0.07	11%	1 Jun →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	25%	1 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.07	7%	1 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	18%	31 May →
mirage	13–6	0.04	22%	31 May →
cache	11–13	0.01	21%	31 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	13%	27 May →
anubis	11–13	0.07	20%	27 May →
dust2	11–13	0.01	19%	27 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	4%	27 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	29%	24 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	20%	24 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.04	9%	24 May →
cache	3–13	0.01	15%	24 May →
stronghold	12–12	0.01	16%	24 May →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	31%	24 May →
cache	8–13	-0.04	13%	24 May →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	11%	16 May →
dust2	13–4	-0.07	12%	13 May →
inferno	13–4	0.02	8%	13 May →
overpass	13–16	-0.00	23%	13 May →
cache	10–13	-0.07	3%	13 May →
ancient	6–13	0.01	22%	12 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	9%	12 May →
cache	13–6	0.00	13%	12 May →
ancient	9–13	0.01	6%	11 May →
dust2	13–9	0.06	25%	11 May →
anubis	13–6	0.04	30%	11 May →