BEEFYMARMOT

BEEFYMARMOT — CS2 Stats

76561197970320684[U:1:10054956]Steam profile ↗

3,694Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,497Purple band · top ~18.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9146 of 16166 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,407 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBEEFYMARMOTFACEITLevel 7 · 1,407 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,497 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning55
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48466Last 10048%Win rateWLWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression4.8
Utility5.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time594ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–4
132Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%0.01
infernoB20101050%0.00
nukeC156940%-0.00
dust2C146843%0.00
anubisS107370%0.01
ancientD82625%-0.01
cacheA74357%0.00
overpass110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,045Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6856%1.0615.0
Ancient4137%0.8714.0
Anubis2556%1.0116.3
Dust22045%0.7611.3
Nuke1953%1.1416.6
Mirage1354%1.0115.7
Vertigo1080%0.8411.7
Overpass475%0.9213.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
591msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.40HE damage / grenade
14.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.4316% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–14-0.0421%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0423%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0530%26 Aug
ancient13–100.0247%25 Aug
inferno13–70.0226%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0323%25 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0716%25 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0124%24 Aug
dust24–130.0424%24 Aug
nuke13–30.0720%24 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0030%23 Aug
cache13–160.0118%23 Aug
cache13–11-0.0213%23 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0129%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0428%23 Aug
mirage13–80.0111%23 Aug
nuke13–40.0936%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0526%20 Aug
cache13–10-0.0412%20 Aug
anubis15–12-0.0013%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0021%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0310%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0121%19 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0118%16 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0035%16 Aug
mirage19–16-0.0320%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0420%16 Aug
ancient13–80.0523%16 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0714%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.1023%16 Aug
mirage9–130.1127%16 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0831%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0120%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0613%3 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0632%3 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0120%3 Aug
dust213–100.0735%2 Aug
anubis13–60.0135%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.0237%2 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0128%2 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0017%2 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0617%2 Aug
dust212–120.0246%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0129%2 Aug
inferno13–30.0621%29 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0026%29 Jul
inferno13–40.1423%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0220%24 Jul
mirage15–150.0525%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0331%23 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0845%23 Jul
dust213–110.0430%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0238%21 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0826%20 Jul
anubis13–110.0736%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0518%19 Jul
anubis16–130.0039%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0322%14 Jul
inferno9–130.0235%14 Jul
cache13–70.0943%13 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0131%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0425%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0140%12 Jul
mirage5–130.0218%12 Jul
nuke11–130.0333%9 Jul
cache13–80.0244%8 Jul
mirage13–30.1438%8 Jul
inferno12–120.0635%8 Jul
mirage13–60.1139%7 Jul
dust213–100.0125%7 Jul
nuke13–60.0535%7 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0738%7 Jul
dust25–00.0750%7 Jul
dust212–12-0.0120%6 Jul
inferno1–60.0721%6 Jul
inferno6–130.0019%5 Jul
anubis4–130.0332%5 Jul
mirage7–130.0328%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0325%1 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0129%1 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0120%1 Jul
inferno13–100.0020%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0438%1 Jul
dust213–16-0.097%30 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0135%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0024%28 Jun
nuke13–2-0.0436%28 Jun
anubis13–40.0738%28 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0617%28 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0717%28 Jun
dust213–90.0327%28 Jun
mirage13–60.0734%28 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0220%25 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0350%25 Jun
mirage12–120.0422%24 Jun
dust29–130.0326%23 Jun
dust213–90.0626%23 Jun
mirage1–13-0.1017%23 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0019%21 Jun
ancient7–130.0115%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →