gEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZ — CS2 Stats

76561197968592900[U:1:8327172]

347Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning49
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51418Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.0
Utility4.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch8.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time680ms+50ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 680ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–1
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
138In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1871139%-0.00
infernoB158753%0.02
nukeA138562%-0.00
cacheB137654%-0.01
mirageS128467%-0.01
overpassS75271%-0.02
ancientD62433%-0.02
vertigo41325%-0.04
poseidon42250%-0.04
train42250%-0.00
sanctum31233%-0.13
anubis1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

639Matches
57%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
66.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno425%0.8714.8
Anubis425%0.9013.8
Dust2450%0.9614.0
Ancient250%0.9115.5
Train250%0.7010.0
Mirage20%0.8814.0
Nuke10%0.6511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
6.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5589% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0522%26 Jun
nuke11–130.0415%6 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0221%6 Jun
vertigo6–9-0.0332%6 Jun
inferno9–10.2223%6 Jun
dust29–13-0.0726%25 May
nuke13–9-0.0814%25 May
inferno9–40.1123%24 May
cache8–0-0.0444%24 May
cache13–5-0.0111%24 May
cache12–12-0.1014%24 May
nuke13–50.0417%24 May
overpass9–70.0115%24 May
cache13–40.0331%23 May
vertigo5–9-0.1011%23 May
nuke9–50.0122%23 May
inferno6–9-0.0130%23 May
cache7–13-0.0321%17 May
cache10–130.0125%17 May
overpass9–7-0.1326%16 May
sanctum9–6-0.0833%16 May
poseidon9–40.0119%16 May
inferno7–9-0.1021%16 May
nuke9–40.0821%16 May
vertigo7–9-0.0711%16 May
inferno6–13-0.0413%16 May
dust216–120.0033%16 May
nuke0–13-0.0724%16 May
cache13–110.0214%15 May
inferno3–9-0.1425%15 May
poseidon9–70.0019%15 May
nuke1–13-0.0510%15 May
dust28–13-0.0214%14 May
overpass9–40.0435%10 May
sanctum1–9-0.1550%10 May
vertigo9–30.0319%10 May
poseidon8–8-0.1432%10 May
cache12–12-0.0219%10 May
inferno9–13-0.1122%10 May
nuke9–70.0421%10 May
cache13–3-0.0424%10 May
inferno8–80.0517%10 May
sanctum5–9-0.1713%9 May
cache11–130.0628%6 May
cache13–6-0.0218%6 May
cache13–7-0.0121%6 May
cache12–120.0017%6 May
mirage13–5-0.0024%6 May
inferno13–80.0220%4 May
mirage10–13-0.0424%26 Apr
dust213–7-0.0122%26 Apr
anubis11–130.0317%26 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0324%26 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0434%25 Apr
ancient13–110.0217%25 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0327%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0614%24 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0117%23 Apr
mirage4–10.0950%23 Apr
dust213–80.070%22 Apr
inferno13–20.1430%22 Apr
dust213–110.0218%16 Apr
dust25–130.0121%12 Apr
inferno13–10.0633%12 Apr
dust215–15-0.0210%11 Apr
nuke9–50.0219%8 Apr
overpass9–4-0.0321%8 Apr
poseidon7–9-0.0513%8 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0520%6 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0327%5 Apr
inferno13–40.0524%5 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0039%4 Apr
dust213–16-0.0320%4 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0124%2 Apr
inferno13–50.0419%25 Mar
dust25–13-0.0339%27 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0230%27 Nov
nuke6–13-0.0129%24 Nov
dust213–11-0.0315%28 Sept
dust213–110.0325%28 Sept
ancient13–110.0217%27 Sept
train13–9-0.0212%27 Sept
dust211–13-0.0227%20 Sept
overpass6–13-0.0613%20 Sept
overpass13–90.0524%20 Sept
overpass9–13-0.0228%15 Sept
inferno7–10.0225%15 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0223%14 Sept
mirage13–110.0221%14 Sept
dust25–13-0.0717%13 Sept
dust215–150.0825%13 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0529%13 Sept
train13–7-0.0611%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0524%13 Sept
train10–130.0736%13 Sept
dust29–130.0619%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0119%9 Sept
train13–160.0113%8 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0611%8 Sept
ancient10–130.0315%8 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →