Klimbim

Klimbim — CS2 Stats

76561197960366915[U:1:101187]Steam profile ↗

1,964Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKlimbimFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning39
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43543Last 10043%Win rateLLLWLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression3.9
Utility6.6
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning3.9
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time636ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–11
133Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 9ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C26111542%-0.02
nukeB168850%-0.01
mirageC156940%-0.04
ancientD134931%0.00
infernoC104640%-0.03
anubisA95456%-0.02
overpassC73443%-0.03
cache42250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

447Matches
53%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
83.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5100%1.6118.8
Ancient425%0.8213.0
Vertigo333%0.9414.3
Mirage20%1.0016.0
Nuke250%1.6912.0
Dust22100%1.9216.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
632msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
18.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.1123% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0515%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0121%14 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0315%14 Jul
dust213–100.0320%13 Jul
inferno11–13-0.028%13 Jul
cache15–15-0.0617%10 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0118%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0515%9 Jul
cache13–80.0016%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0416%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0116%8 Jul
cache13–50.0119%8 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0311%5 Jul
nuke13–40.0133%5 Jul
dust213–60.0119%2 Jul
dust210–13-0.0622%2 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0319%23 Jun
nuke13–30.048%23 Jun
dust210–13-0.0516%23 Jun
dust28–13-0.0316%14 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0318%14 Jun
ancient13–50.0420%14 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0614%13 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0517%13 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0419%13 Jun
ancient14–160.0615%11 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0119%11 Jun
inferno13–10-0.068%5 Jun
mirage9–130.0017%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0521%4 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0425%4 Jun
dust23–13-0.0918%4 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0729%30 May
dust216–120.0613%30 May
mirage13–11-0.0316%30 May
dust211–130.0117%30 May
overpass7–13-0.0411%27 May
dust27–13-0.0611%22 May
nuke11–13-0.0121%22 May
inferno13–110.0133%21 May
nuke13–7-0.0821%21 May
ancient7–13-0.0512%10 May
inferno13–6-0.0122%10 May
overpass8–13-0.0229%8 May
dust24–13-0.0618%8 May
mirage4–13-0.0713%7 May
dust28–130.0119%6 May
nuke10–130.0210%6 May
overpass13–110.0026%4 May
ancient6–13-0.0225%4 May
mirage13–5-0.079%1 May
dust213–10-0.0112%1 May
inferno7–13-0.1038%25 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0723%25 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0710%21 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0511%20 Apr
dust213–10-0.069%20 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0816%14 Apr
anubis13–70.0115%13 Apr
anubis13–3-0.010%13 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0420%7 Apr
dust29–13-0.0020%5 Apr
dust213–11-0.0222%2 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0518%2 Apr
nuke9–13-0.009%2 Apr
dust22–13-0.0918%1 Apr
overpass13–8-0.049%1 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0418%28 Mar
ancient13–110.1112%28 Mar
anubis13–40.0112%28 Mar
nuke13–110.0315%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.0125%23 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0529%23 Mar
anubis13–6-0.0418%22 Mar
ancient8–130.0115%22 Mar
inferno13–30.0623%22 Mar
nuke13–80.0221%22 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0214%21 Mar
dust213–11-0.0515%21 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0616%18 Mar
mirage13–60.0322%18 Mar
dust213–7-0.0019%18 Mar
dust213–10-0.0318%17 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0318%17 Mar
dust210–13-0.068%15 Mar
dust28–13-0.0321%13 Mar
anubis3–130.0219%13 Mar
ancient13–60.0318%13 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0224%9 Mar
overpass13–7-0.018%8 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0513%8 Mar
ancient16–14-0.019%8 Mar
mirage10–130.0223%5 Mar
nuke13–100.0425%5 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0215%1 Mar
dust213–110.0221%1 Mar
dust213–50.0224%1 Mar
anubis5–13-0.058%1 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0732%28 Feb
ancient7–13-0.019%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →