chop — CS2 Stats

76561197960276031[U:1:10303]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

714Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,580Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7955 of 23758 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,015 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning60

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLTWLLWWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression7.4

Utility4.4

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning6.0

Utility4.4

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time603ms+17ms

first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%+0.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — overpass 13–3

13–3Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	21	10–11	48%	-0.00
nuke	A	18	10–8	56%	0.02
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.00
cache	S	13	9–4	69%	0.01
inferno	D	12	4–8	33%	0.01
ancient	D	8	2–6	25%	0.03
overpass	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

450Matches

58%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

77.7ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

6%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	13	77%	0.81	12.6
Mirage	13	54%	0.75	13.1
Ancient	13	31%	0.71	11.2
Dust2	8	50%	0.95	14.9
Vertigo	7	57%	0.65	12.3
Inferno	4	25%	0.71	12.3
Nuke	3	33%	0.76	15.0
Overpass	3	33%	1.60	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy

35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

84.9%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

604msReaction time

28.7%T opening success

56.7%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

10.1%Flash assists

7.46HE damage / grenade

5.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.6617% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	7–13	-0.02	25%	27 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.03	22%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	24%	26 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.11	16%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	13%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	28%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	21%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.06	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	11%	23 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.00	15%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	22%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.07	33%	21 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.03	18%	21 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.09	78%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	22%	17 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	19%	14 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	30%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	25%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	19%	9 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	23%	4 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	22%	1 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	8%	1 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.04	17%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.06	37%	1 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	14%	31 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	4%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	22%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	22%	27 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.03	20%	27 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.05	13%	22 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.08	21%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	13%	22 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	31%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.09	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.00	30%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.08	25%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	31%	15 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	28%	14 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	27%	14 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.02	30%	14 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.10	24%	12 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.07	19%	12 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.00	27%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	21%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	24%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.08	28%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	16%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	9 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	20%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	11%	5 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	29%	5 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	31%	5 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	19%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.05	13%	5 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	30%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	29%	5 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	24%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–10	0.03	22%	3 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	15%	3 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	27%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	16%	1 Jul →
overpass	15–15	0.01	18%	1 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	20%	30 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.02	19%	28 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.11	17%	28 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.02	19%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	12%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	18%	27 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	22%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.02	28%	25 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	17%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.12	33%	25 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.02	19%	22 Jun →
ancient	14–16	0.06	16%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	19%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.09	24%	14 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.05	29%	13 Jun →
nuke	16–14	0.01	26%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	18%	11 Jun →
inferno	14–16	0.03	22%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	21%	10 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	16%	10 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.05	15%	9 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.05	27%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.00	26%	7 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.01	17%	7 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.05	20%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	26%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	21%	5 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.13	28%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	22%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.04	22%	2 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	20%	2 Jun →