← Back to Matches
Stake Ranked · Episode 4: Closed Qualifier 2026 · Playoffs
C-Tier

HOTU vs FOKUS

Finished
Format: BO3·Played: Sep 5, 14:54 UTC
Like what you see? Place your bets on live CS2 matches.Bet on This Match →

Map Results

AncientAncientMap 1
LHOTU
LW
WFOKUS
Duration: 42:30
Dust2Dust2Map 2
WHOTU
WL
LFOKUS
Duration: 32:21
NukeNukeMap 3
LHOTU
LW
WFOKUS
Duration: 58:01

Streams

Map Breakdown

Series best: jocab 1.37 average rating across 3 maps.

Nuke

HOTU 1013 FOKUS
HOTU1st half 7 · 2nd half 3CT 7/12 · T 3/11Pistols 2/2
FOKUS1st half 5 · 2nd half 8CT 8/11 · T 5/12Pistols 0/2

FOKUS came back from 5 rounds down (0–5) to win the map.

PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
podiFOKUS26143+1294.791%1.65
mizuHOTU23187+595.874%1.51
jocabFOKUS11125-156.287%1.13
MatheosFOKUS17145+392.561%1.10
BanjoFOKUS15174-274.370%1.06
kade0HOTU12143-253.265%0.98
frontalesHOTU11156-465.678%0.89
n0rb3r7HOTU13197-668.874%0.82
ztrFOKUS14167-266.061%0.77
DwushkaHOTU13174-458.548%0.73

Dust2

HOTU 134 FOKUS
HOTU1st half 8 · 2nd half 5CT 5/5 · T 8/12Pistols 2/2
FOKUS1st half 4 · 2nd half 0CT 4/12 · T 0/5Pistols 0/2
PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
mizuHOTU1674+984.282%1.51
kade0HOTU16104+687.482%1.40
DwushkaHOTU12105+279.077%1.40
frontalesHOTU1488+665.471%1.25
n0rb3r7HOTU101010+084.888%1.21
ztrFOKUS13155-290.671%1.14
BanjoFOKUS8124-463.371%0.90
jocabFOKUS7136-671.671%0.76
podiFOKUS11133-249.047%0.61
MatheosFOKUS6153-939.365%0.54

Ancient

HOTU 613 FOKUS
HOTU1st half 6 · 2nd half 0CT 6/12 · T 0/7Pistols 1/2
FOKUS1st half 6 · 2nd half 7CT 7/7 · T 6/12Pistols 1/2

FOKUS came back from 5 rounds down (0–5) to win the map.

PlayerKDA+/−ADRKASTRating
jocabFOKUS2288+14119.195%2.22
MatheosFOKUS16136+384.679%1.30
frontalesHOTU13136+076.863%1.30
BanjoFOKUS1494+576.084%1.28
kade0HOTU14166-286.274%1.03
podiFOKUS13123+170.784%0.96
mizuHOTU11164-557.474%0.88
ztrFOKUS131510-275.968%0.87
n0rb3r7HOTU11177-679.868%0.77
DwushkaHOTU8161-841.858%0.46

About HOTU vs FOKUS

This BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match is part of Playoffs on the Stake Ranked circuit. FOKUS took the series 1–2. For head-to-head form and predicted lineups, see the head-to-head tool and the prediction model.