zen

zen — CS2 Stats

76561199127147865[U:1:1166882137]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

427Tracked matches60%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating29,431Top 1% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#882 of 238253 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 10 days played since 20 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,431 +1,851 20 Jul22 Sept · 12 days played
27,47429,932peak 29,93220 Jul22 Sept
29,932Peak Premier in tracked matches
10Days played since 2026-07-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 501 below peak (29,932)
  • +1,851 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 569 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzenPREMIER29,431 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning32
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51481Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +9.0pp headshot accuracy · +72ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility1.8
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning3.2
Utility1.8
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time548ms−123ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 13 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 21 Sept
266msFastest reaction time · 0–10 · inferno, 21 Sept
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 21 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35191654%-0.03
mirageB23121152%-0.03
infernoB136746%-0.03
ancientC104640%-0.01
anubisC73443%0.02
nukeS64267%-0.02
cache32167%0.03
eldorado110100%-0.00
overpass1010%-0.07
poseidon1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
58.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
530msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
23.7%CT opening success
0.19Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
9.70HE damage / grenade
3.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1879 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0246% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–20.0226%22 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0220%22 Sept
ancient13–10.1426%22 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0711%22 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0321%22 Sept
mirage13–4-0.115%22 Sept
anubis0–13-0.0350%22 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0811%21 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0314%21 Sept
dust213–1-0.04100%21 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0724%21 Sept
dust213–00.000%21 Sept
dust26–13-0.0228%21 Sept
dust213–40.0617%21 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0417%21 Sept
mirage13–90.0311%21 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0018%21 Sept
dust23–11-0.0722%21 Sept
ancient3–130.0130%21 Sept
mirage13–60.0628%21 Sept
mirage13–00.0138%21 Sept
dust216–130.0121%21 Sept
inferno0–10-0.068%21 Sept
dust211–13-0.0211%21 Sept
mirage13–0-0.0117%21 Sept
nuke13–80.0030%19 Sept
inferno13–1-0.0429%19 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0819%19 Sept
anubis13–4-0.013%19 Sept
dust25–13-0.0022%19 Sept
mirage10–1-0.0526%19 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0320%19 Sept
dust20–13-0.0229%19 Sept
inferno0–13-0.0633%19 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0116%19 Sept
dust24–13-0.0326%19 Sept
dust210–13-0.0422%19 Sept
dust23–130.0619%19 Sept
anubis13–30.0218%18 Sept
dust213–5-0.0131%18 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0612%18 Sept
dust213–11-0.0219%18 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0440%18 Sept
dust213–50.0920%18 Sept
anubis4–130.136%18 Sept
anubis13–50.1524%18 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0415%18 Sept
dust213–7-0.0612%18 Sept
dust213–00.0331%18 Sept
dust213–3-0.0821%18 Sept
nuke13–10.0536%18 Sept
dust213–20.0336%18 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0644%16 Sept
mirage2–30.1289%16 Sept
mirage3–11-0.0318%16 Sept
dust213–7-0.0413%16 Sept
dust23–13-0.0610%16 Sept
dust20–13-0.0811%16 Sept
eldorado9–7-0.0015%14 Sept
dust213–6-0.0629%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0114%14 Sept
cache13–90.0822%14 Sept
cache3–10-0.0321%14 Sept
dust213–110.0425%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.1313%14 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0821%14 Sept
inferno0–13-0.0427%14 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0113%14 Sept
cache13–20.0515%14 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0152%14 Sept
inferno9–50.1322%14 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0715%13 Sept
dust20–13-0.0319%13 Sept
inferno9–00.1725%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0135%13 Sept
inferno8–8-0.1911%13 Sept
overpass7–9-0.0740%13 Sept
poseidon2–90.0146%13 Sept
dust28–20.0020%13 Sept
dust20–13-0.1043%13 Sept
ancient8–130.0016%13 Sept
mirage11–00.058%12 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0838%12 Sept
dust213–5-0.0815%12 Sept
mirage13–10.0317%12 Sept
dust213–110.0127%12 Sept
mirage0–13-0.150%12 Sept
dust20–13-0.0429%12 Sept
dust213–5-0.1027%12 Sept
inferno4–13-0.140%11 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0318%11 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0924%11 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0719%11 Sept
mirage13–0-0.0113%20 Jul
dust213–1-0.0438%20 Jul
ancient13–30.0117%20 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0325%20 Jul
dust21–13-0.080%20 Jul
dust21–13-0.1250%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.1213%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →