Kenz

Kenz — CS2 Stats

ID76561198844090585[U:1:883824857]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

728Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,467Top 10% of 210,006 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17470 of 257234 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,467 +835 23 Jul – 20 Oct · 23 days played
24,63228,006peak 28,00623 Jul20 Oct
28,270Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-07-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,539 below peak (28,006)
  • -775 over 30 days · declining
  • +835 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,533 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKenzPREMIER25,467 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time566ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 28 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 9 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 17 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2312–1152%0.02
dust2A1710–759%-0.02
ancientA159–660%0.01
nukeB137–654%0.00
anubisA117–464%0.01
infernoC94–544%0.03
cacheA85–363%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.09
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

280Matches
59%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
75.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage757%1.3017.9
Dust2580%1.3214.0
Anubis560%0.9818.6
Ancient475%1.0011.5
Nuke250%0.9218.0
Inferno20%0.6010.5
Vertigo1100%1.0521.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
564msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
7.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.044% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.0421%20 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0720%20 Oct →
anubis13–90.0021%20 Oct →
mirage10–10.0512%18 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0114%18 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0214%18 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0210%9 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0013%9 Oct →
dust213–70.0111%9 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0319%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0415%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0022%30 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0419%26 Sept →
dust213–50.0319%24 Sept →
ancient13–40.0021%24 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.040%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.028%24 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0928%24 Sept →
nuke11–130.0221%10 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0115%10 Sept →
nuke13–70.0612%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.1230%10 Sept →
overpass12–120.0017%9 Sept →
train6–13-0.0418%9 Sept →
dust212–4-0.0119%9 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.01100%9 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.1014%6 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0026%6 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.060%6 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1338%4 Sept →
cache13–160.0117%4 Sept →
ancient13–30.0415%4 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0531%4 Sept →
ancient13–70.0820%3 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0535%2 Sept →
inferno13–60.0312%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0514%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0318%1 Sept →
mirage13–50.0520%1 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0010%29 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0017%29 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0121%29 Aug →
mirage13–40.0620%29 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0016%27 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0221%27 Aug →
inferno13–110.0124%27 Aug →
mirage0–130.000%27 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0024%20 Aug →
mirage13–90.0317%20 Aug →
dust213–100.0326%17 Aug →
inferno6–130.0629%17 Aug →
mirage13–70.0422%16 Aug →
dust213–70.0228%14 Aug →
anubis3–130.008%14 Aug →
cache6–13-0.046%14 Aug →
ancient13–80.0820%13 Aug →
mirage11–130.0717%13 Aug →
dust213–60.0710%13 Aug →
anubis13–80.2018%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.1022%10 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.027%8 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0226%8 Aug →
overpass13–40.0212%7 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0725%7 Aug →
ancient13–50.0923%6 Aug →
anubis13–40.0716%5 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0415%5 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0014%5 Aug →
mirage13–90.0120%5 Aug →
cache13–160.0111%5 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0422%5 Aug →
ancient9–130.0223%1 Aug →
mirage13–110.0720%1 Aug →
anubis13–10.0517%1 Aug →
cache13–110.1415%1 Aug →
inferno13–80.0819%1 Aug →
nuke4–130.0217%1 Aug →
nuke13–40.0616%30 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0913%30 Jul →
nuke13–40.0213%30 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0215%30 Jul →
dust29–13-0.109%30 Jul →
mirage0–10-0.050%28 Jul →
inferno13–30.0819%28 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.026%28 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.1020%28 Jul →
dust210–13-0.098%28 Jul →
mirage13–00.2410%28 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0812%28 Jul →
cache13–70.0829%28 Jul →
dust213–00.000%28 Jul →
inferno11–130.0421%23 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0614%23 Jul →
ancient13–80.0221%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0513%23 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0516%23 Jul →
ancient13–30.0717%23 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0218%23 Jul →
mirage9–130.0614%23 Jul →
ancient12–120.038%20 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.