Mr.Quack

Mr.Quack — CS2 Stats

76561198266741482[U:1:306475754]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

942Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,717Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41112 of 221194 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,422 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,717 +2,904 23 Aug16 Sept · 14 days played
19,81322,909peak 22,90923 Aug16 Sept
22,909Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,422Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,422
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 192 below peak (22,909)
  • +2,904 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,283 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMr.QuackFACEITLevel 6 · 1,422 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,717 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,422csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning61
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateWWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility7.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.4

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.1
Utility7.6
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time572ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 6–1 · dust2, 26 Aug
64%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 1 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 10 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%0.01
dust2A2415963%0.03
infernoA138562%0.02
ancientS128467%0.03
cacheC125742%0.05
anubisC104640%0.02
nuke32167%-0.01
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
86.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3650%1.1216.2
Dust22962%1.1215.9
Ancient1839%1.1816.0
Anubis1443%1.1114.9
Inferno1471%1.4216.5
Cache367%1.4615.0
Overpass367%1.2218.0
Nuke333%1.0313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
69.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
576msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
11.66HE damage / grenade
18.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0028%16 Sept
anubis13–60.1019%16 Sept
mirage3–130.0035%16 Sept
inferno6–130.0223%15 Sept
inferno13–30.0839%15 Sept
mirage6–130.0318%15 Sept
dust27–13-0.0417%15 Sept
mirage13–10.0523%15 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0119%15 Sept
ancient13–100.0118%15 Sept
dust213–4-0.0222%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0025%15 Sept
mirage13–80.1024%15 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0715%15 Sept
dust213–80.1219%14 Sept
anubis11–130.0019%14 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0730%14 Sept
ancient4–110.0725%14 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0336%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0026%13 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0219%13 Sept
anubis9–130.0221%13 Sept
cache13–70.0341%13 Sept
inferno8–130.0528%13 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0122%13 Sept
ancient13–40.0715%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0126%12 Sept
dust26–13-0.0316%12 Sept
ancient5–130.0820%12 Sept
inferno8–130.0216%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0015%10 Sept
cache6–130.0312%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0629%10 Sept
inferno6–13-0.076%10 Sept
anubis13–50.0922%10 Sept
dust213–70.0218%10 Sept
inferno13–30.1125%9 Sept
inferno13–110.0326%9 Sept
ancient13–110.0221%9 Sept
mirage4–130.0627%9 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0221%9 Sept
cache5–13-0.0223%8 Sept
mirage13–30.0421%8 Sept
mirage16–120.0312%7 Sept
inferno5–130.0521%6 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0121%6 Sept
cache13–4-0.0215%6 Sept
mirage8–130.0121%6 Sept
dust213–80.0716%6 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0117%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0911%6 Sept
anubis5–130.0222%5 Sept
inferno7–10.0425%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0120%4 Sept
nuke13–30.0113%4 Sept
dust26–13-0.0520%4 Sept
cache13–70.2325%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0521%3 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0713%1 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0664%1 Sept
cache7–130.0327%1 Sept
dust213–110.0828%1 Sept
dust213–60.1016%1 Sept
cache9–130.1623%1 Sept
dust213–6-0.027%31 Aug
dust213–5-0.0121%31 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0326%31 Aug
ancient13–110.0621%31 Aug
mirage13–80.0414%31 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0523%31 Aug
dust211–13-0.0129%31 Aug
cache3–80.0118%31 Aug
cache13–40.1231%31 Aug
ancient13–60.1228%31 Aug
dust213–40.0028%31 Aug
dust212–120.0020%29 Aug
cache13–3-0.0411%29 Aug
dust28–13-0.0118%29 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0317%28 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0222%28 Aug
dust213–110.0423%28 Aug
dust214–16-0.0324%27 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0230%26 Aug
dust26–10.2730%26 Aug
dust211–130.0331%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0522%26 Aug
dust213–100.0420%26 Aug
cache8–130.0118%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0130%25 Aug
dust213–4-0.0316%25 Aug
dust213–10-0.0213%25 Aug
train5–130.0125%24 Aug
dust213–60.1723%24 Aug
mirage13–10.0620%24 Aug
inferno13–50.0424%24 Aug
cache9–130.0325%24 Aug
anubis0–130.0530%24 Aug
nuke16–140.0226%23 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0126%23 Aug
dust22–130.0222%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →