` ᴅʀᴇᴀᴍᴢ︵♦

` ᴅʀᴇᴀᴍᴢ︵♦ — CS2 Stats

CX76561198189044128[U:1:228778400]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,557Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,820Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,765Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40497 of 220544 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,019 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 16 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,765 -1,509 16 Aug16 Sept · 18 days played
22,59326,027peak 26,02716 Aug16 Sept
26,194Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,019Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,019
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,262 below peak (26,027)
  • -902 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,235 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4226+16
Win rate50%50%0pp
K/D0.740.67+0.06
Headshot %40%44%−3pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.6%42.7%43.8%4.2% short
Shot accuracy3.2%11.2%12.0%8.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.991.020.26 short
Match win rate46.1%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG` ᴅʀᴇᴀᴍᴢ︵♦FACEITLevel 4 · 1,019 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,765 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,019csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning52
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLWLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 437ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 476ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility5.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 57% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.4
Mechanics1.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time496ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 18 Aug
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · ancient, 20 Aug
188msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 7 Sept
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 12 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 38anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A38221658%-0.01
mirageB33161748%0.00
ancientC125742%-0.03
anubisC104640%-0.01
nuke32167%-0.01
inferno220100%-0.00
vertigo110100%0.06
cache1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,301Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
4,310Matches
46.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
39.6%Headshot %
3.2%Shot accuracy
7,741MVPs
1,820Hours (in match)
7,044Bombs planted
696Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,578
MP94,029
MAC-103,064
SG 5532,402
AUG2,122
AWP1,329

Lifetime map wins

14,040dust2
5,296inferno
2,108nuke
814train
492vertigo
6italy
3office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

658Matches
49%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
70.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22156%0.8013.0
Dust218244%0.8013.1
Ancient11450%0.8714.3
Inferno5941%0.8112.9
Nuke2748%0.9114.8
Overpass2050%0.7512.4
Anubis1947%0.7311.6
Train1540%0.7112.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
57.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
495msReaction time
25.1%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.47HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.1152% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0514%16 Sept
ancient13–10-0.019%16 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0614%15 Sept
dust23–130.0128%15 Sept
dust213–9-0.0310%15 Sept
mirage13–100.0113%15 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0711%15 Sept
mirage3–130.0511%15 Sept
dust213–9-0.0119%15 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0714%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0318%15 Sept
dust25–13-0.0412%14 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0213%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0510%14 Sept
anubis8–130.0220%14 Sept
dust211–130.0113%13 Sept
dust216–14-0.0314%13 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0515%13 Sept
ancient10–130.0311%13 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0118%13 Sept
dust213–00.0518%12 Sept
dust213–30.0211%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0511%12 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0314%12 Sept
anubis10–13-0.027%12 Sept
dust213–90.0319%12 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0313%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0624%12 Sept
dust210–13-0.0122%12 Sept
dust216–14-0.0229%11 Sept
dust213–90.0416%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0620%11 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0217%11 Sept
dust213–60.0011%11 Sept
dust213–9-0.0719%11 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0314%10 Sept
mirage8–130.033%10 Sept
mirage7–13-0.078%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0324%9 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0215%9 Sept
dust213–3-0.0722%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0917%9 Sept
dust213–20.0320%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0313%9 Sept
mirage13–50.005%9 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0320%8 Sept
mirage0–13-0.030%7 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0513%3 Sept
dust216–13-0.0126%3 Sept
mirage9–130.0311%3 Sept
dust213–4-0.0119%3 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0113%3 Sept
vertigo13–80.0613%2 Sept
mirage1–13-0.048%31 Aug
mirage13–70.1321%21 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0412%21 Aug
dust213–70.0213%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0313%21 Aug
dust29–130.0020%21 Aug
dust215–150.0616%20 Aug
inferno13–100.0318%20 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0129%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0028%20 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0337%20 Aug
dust211–130.0136%20 Aug
mirage16–140.0119%20 Aug
mirage6–130.0024%19 Aug
mirage13–80.0413%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0120%19 Aug
dust21–13-0.0513%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0526%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0420%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0324%19 Aug
mirage6–130.0326%19 Aug
dust26–130.1121%19 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0123%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0210%19 Aug
dust213–10.0024%18 Aug
mirage13–20.0215%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0414%18 Aug
dust213–5-0.0616%18 Aug
anubis13–10-0.015%18 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0314%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0118%18 Aug
anubis14–160.0217%18 Aug
mirage13–50.1522%18 Aug
dust27–130.0411%18 Aug
cache11–130.016%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0710%17 Aug
ancient8–13-0.029%17 Aug
ancient4–11-0.1210%17 Aug
dust212–160.0111%17 Aug
mirage13–50.089%17 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0126%17 Aug
ancient13–50.0214%17 Aug
anubis15–150.0017%17 Aug
dust214–16-0.0517%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0418%16 Aug
anubis13–2-0.015%16 Aug
dust213–6-0.037%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →